第三人侵害债权之研究
发布时间:2018-04-14 14:06
本文选题:第三人 + 侵害债权 ; 参考:《江西财经大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:民法一般观点认为,侵权针对的主要是指物权、知识产权等权利,债权一般不会认定是侵权行为所包含的内容,然而,随着市场的繁荣和国家的进步,第三人侵害债权的行为大量出现,其它的发达国家和地区从学术界到司法界,各个方面都逐渐加强对第三人侵害债权的分析和思考,对民众进行债权保护,该制度具有较大的积极作用,同时,该制度对债之相对性观点形成了较大影响,因此对是该制度应否确立,各方观点不一、对立较大,笔者以第三人侵害债权作为论点,着手从四方面展开论述。第一篇,首先从国内外各种观点中比较得出第三人侵害债权的含义,解决什么是第三人侵害债权的问题,接着从两个层次分析为什么要建立第三人侵害债权制度。第二篇,对第三人侵害债权制度进行探讨,分析介绍第三人侵害债权制度在大陆法系国家地区及英美法系国家的情况,通过比较得出观点,找到共同点。第三篇,以前面的分析为前提,展开分析第三人侵害债权,先对第三人侵害债权制度的组成进行论述,主要讨论“六要素”说,再对第三人侵害债权的案件进行分类说明,以明确第三人侵害债权行为彼此之间的差异,主要讨论第三人侵害债权的方式,区分第三人直接侵害债权及第三人间接侵害债权,对于不同的侵权方法,提出不同的责任主张,接着分析第三人如果有侵害债权的举动,那些情形可以让其不承担责任,找出免责情形,总结免责事由。第四篇,最后回归我国立法现状及司法现状,鉴于我国已通过的《侵权责任法》对第三人侵害债权还是一片空白,说明我国第三人侵害债权所处的现状,探讨我国第三人侵害债权纠纷案件的司法审判,从立法、司法两方面作总结,提出适合中国特色的立法建议。
[Abstract]:The general view of civil law is that the infringement mainly refers to the rights of real right, intellectual property and other rights, and the creditor's rights are not generally recognized as the contents of the infringement. However, with the prosperity of the market and the progress of the country,The third party infringes on the creditor's rights in a large number. In other developed countries and regions, from the academic circles to the judicial circles, all aspects have gradually strengthened the analysis and thinking of the third party's infringement of the creditor's rights, so as to protect the people's claims.At the same time, the system has a great influence on the relative view of debt. Therefore, the author takes the third party's infringement of creditor's rights as an argument that whether the system should be established or not.Start the discussion from four aspects.The first part first compares the meaning of the third party's infringement of creditor's rights from various points of view at home and abroad, solves the problem of what is the third party's infringement of the creditor's rights, and then analyzes why the third party infringes the creditor's rights system from two levels.The second part discusses the system of infringement of creditor's rights by the third party, analyzes and introduces the situation of the infringement of the creditor's rights by the third party in the countries of the continental law system and the countries of the Anglo-American legal system, and finds the common ground by comparing the views of the third party against the creditor's rights.The third part, on the premise of the previous analysis, analyzes the third party's infringement of creditor's rights, first discusses the composition of the third party's infringement of creditor's rights system, mainly discusses the theory of "six elements", and then explains the case of the third party's infringement of creditor's rights by classification.In order to clarify the difference between the behavior of the third party against the creditor's rights, mainly discuss the way of the third party encroaching on the creditor's rights, distinguish the third party's direct infringement of the creditor's rights from the third party's indirect infringement of the creditor's rights, and put forward different liability claims for different tort methods.Then, if the third party has the behavior of infringing on the creditor's rights, those circumstances can make them take no responsibility, find out the disclaimer and sum up the reason of the exemption.The fourth part, finally returns to our country legislation present situation and the judicatory present situation, in view of our country already passed "Tort liability Law" to the third party infringement creditor's rights is still a blank, explains our country the third party encroaches on the creditor's rights the present situation.This paper probes into the judicial trial of the disputes of infringement of creditor's rights by the third party in our country, summarizes it from the aspects of legislation and judicature, and puts forward some legislative suggestions suitable for Chinese characteristics.
【学位授予单位】:江西财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 杨立新;;制定侵权责任法应当着重解决的几个问题——对2002年12月23日《侵权责任法草案》的研究报告[J];法学杂志;2007年03期
2 魏盛礼;第三人侵害债权理论:理论创新还是法学歧途?[J];河北法学;2005年09期
3 朱晓哲;债之相对性的突破——以第三人侵害债权为中心[J];华东政法学院学报;1999年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 韩宁;第三人侵害债权研究[D];郑州大学;2006年
,本文编号:1749624
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1749624.html