合同订立中的缔约过失与侵权责任探析

发布时间：2018-04-15 11:18

本文选题：合同订立 + 缔约过失　；参考：《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年01期

【摘要】：合同订立是整个合同的最前置阶段,是合同成立、生效、履行(消灭)的根基。在合同订立中,合同当事人往往更加重视合同的成立、生效和履行(消灭)而忽略合同订立中所产生的先合同义务。依据我国《合同法》的规定,当事人因故意或过错违反先合同义务,将依法承担缔约过失责任,而在司法实践中,违反先合同义务也易引起侵权法上的责任。要理解合同订立中的请求权基础构成,有必要厘清缔约过失和侵权责任的关系。在我国现行法制下,为更有利于实现合同当事人在合同订立中民事权利的充分救济,在未来我国有必要认可缔约过失和侵权责任在合同订立中的竞存,摒弃合同订立中民事法律处理请求权竞合的一般性规则。
[Abstract]:The conclusion of a contract is the most advanced stage of the whole contract, the foundation of its formation, entry into force, and performance (annihilation).In the contract formation, the parties to the contract often pay more attention to the formation, effectiveness and performance (elimination) of the contract and ignore the pre-contract obligations arising from the conclusion of the contract.According to the stipulation of contract Law of our country, the party who violates the obligation of prior contract intentionally or wrongly will bear the responsibility of contracting fault according to law, but in judicial practice, the breach of obligation of prior contract will also easily lead to the liability of tort law.In order to understand the basic constitution of claim in contract formation, it is necessary to clarify the relationship between contracting negligence and tort liability.Under the current legal system of our country, in order to realize the full relief of the civil rights of the parties to the contract, it is necessary for our country to recognize the existence of the fault of contracting and the liability of tort in the conclusion of the contract in the future.To reject the general rules of civil law dealing with the concurrence of claims in the formation of contracts.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】