论商标出资适格性要件

发布时间：2018-04-23 00:34

本文选题：商标 + 商标出资　；参考：《学术交流》2015年04期

【摘要】：商标作为知识产权的一种类型,具有无形性的特征。商标的价值不在于标识本身,而在于凝结在商标标识背后的经营者多年累积的商誉。在商标出资的问题上,不能僵硬地套用传统现物出资适格性要件的理论,而应当对我国现行立法细致梳理,针对立法存在的瑕疵,并参照现物出资适格性要件的既有理论,重构商标出资适格性要件,即"权利的确定性""价值的可评估性""标的的可转让性"三个要件。得出结论:在"权利的确定性"方面,未注册商标和商标的许可使用权因不符合权利的确定性要件,在相关立法环境尚未成熟的情况下,不宜作为出资标的;在"价值的可评估性"方面,可以从"法"的角度和"商"的角度确定价值评估二维因素,并佐以国内外商标评估通用方法进行评估;在"标的的可转让性"方面,对共有商标、设质商标、已经许可他人使用的商标分别作出了探讨。
[Abstract]:Trademark, as a type of intellectual property, has the characteristics of invisibility. The value of trademark lies not in the logo itself, but in the goodwill accumulated by the operator behind it. On the issue of trademark capital contribution, we should not apply the theory of the traditional material contribution eligibility elements rigidly, but should carefully comb the current legislation of our country, aim at the defects of the legislation, and refer to the existing theory of the necessary elements of the present property investment. Reconstructing the qualification of trademark contribution, that is, "certainty of right", "evaluability of value" and "transferability of object". The conclusion is as follows: in the aspect of "certainty of rights", the unregistered trademark and the permitted use right of trademark are not in conformity with the deterministic requirements of right, and should not be regarded as the subject of capital contribution when the relevant legislative environment is not mature; In the aspect of "evaluability of value", the two-dimensional factors of value evaluation can be determined from the angle of "law" and "quotient", and appraised by common methods of trademark evaluation at home and abroad. The trademark that has been licensed to be used by others has been discussed separately for the common trademark and the hypothecated trademark.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【分类号】：D923.43

【共引文献】