以损害之名为限制赔偿之实——试论侵权法之完全赔偿原则的自我修正

发布时间：2018-04-27 03:25

本文选题：应赔偿损害 + 损害认定论　；参考：《河北法学》2017年05期

【摘要】：完全赔偿作为侵权损害赔偿之基本原则,并非真正意义上的对全部损害予以全额赔偿的原则。作为其赔偿对象的损害是一个经各类要素和条件过滤后的范畴,可称之为"应赔偿损害"。该损害首先必须符合损害认定时的质、量要求,即损害之造成应符合侵权构成要件,且达到一定之严重程度;其后应经过损失分担时的扣减,即通过损益同销和过失相抵环节,实现侵权人与受害人间责任的合理分配。这一过程虽借助损害之名,实际持有的却是限制赔偿的目的,是完全赔偿为维持其基本原则地位而进行的自我修正。
[Abstract]:As the basic principle of tort compensation, complete compensation is not the principle of full compensation for all damages. The damage as the object of compensation is a category filtered by various elements and conditions, which can be called "compensatory damage". The damage must first meet the quality and quantity requirements of the time the damage is determined, that is, the damage shall be caused in accordance with the constitutive requirements of the infringement and to a certain degree of severity; thereafter, the loss shall be reduced by the share of the loss, that is, the profit and loss shall be sold at the same time as the loss is sold and the fault shall be offset. To realize the reasonable distribution of responsibility between the infringer and the victim. Although this process depends on the name of damage, what it actually holds is the purpose of limiting compensation and the self-correction of complete compensation in order to maintain its basic status of principle.
【作者单位】：福建社会科学院法学研究所;
【基金】：2015年度国家社科基金西部项目《生态文明建设中环境人权的制度化研究》(15XZX020)
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】