论著作权与肖像权的冲突及解决——电影《秋菊打官司》之肖像权案新解

发布时间：2018-05-04 19:30

本文选题：言论自由 + 著作权　；参考：《中央财经大学学报》2015年S1期

【摘要】：将电影《秋菊打官司》之肖像权案定性为言论自由权与肖像权的冲突是对案件的误读。该电影虽侵犯肖像权却并不因此丧失"独创性"等作品之为作品的本质属性,依法应享有著作权,因此该案的本质是著作权与肖像权的冲突。但"享有"著作权并不等于可以自由"行使"著作权。无论依据"权利位阶"原则还是"在先权利优先保护"原则,本案应优先保护肖像权,而优先保护的方式便是限制著作权的行使。
[Abstract]:The conflict between the right to freedom of speech and the right to portray is the misreading of the portraiture right of the film Qiuju. Although the film infringes on the portrait right, it does not lose its "originality" as the essential attribute of the work, and should enjoy copyright according to law, so the essence of the case is the conflict between copyright and portrait right. But "enjoy" copyright is not equal to "free" exercise of "copyright." No matter according to the principle of "right rank" or "priority protection of prior right", the right of portrait should be protected first in this case, and the way of priority protection is to restrict the exercise of copyright.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学;
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】