体育竞赛著作权保护的法理学思考

发布时间：2018-05-05 05:11

本文选题：体育比赛 + 著作权保护之批判　；参考：《知识产权》2017年05期

【摘要】：体育竞赛不能作为著作权法中的"作品"来保护,因为其不符合作品的构成要件,同时用著作权予以保护还严重违背体育竞技的基本精神。但"表演者权"制度可以用来保护竞技者,这既符合著作权的基本法理,又与体育比赛的竞技精神不谋而合,同时还有利于解释"体育赛事转播权"的法权来源,因此该做法可谓"一石多鸟",殊值我国立法和司法理论加以借鉴和运用。
[Abstract]:Sports competition can not be protected as a "work" in copyright law because it does not accord with the constitutive requirements of a work. At the same time, it also violates the basic spirit of sports competition seriously by using copyright to protect it. However, the system of "performer's right" can be used to protect athletes, which not only accords with the basic legal principle of copyright, but also coincides with the competitive spirit of sports competition, and also helps to explain the source of the legal right of "broadcasting right of sports events". Therefore, this practice can be described as "more birds with one stone", especially our legislation and judicial theory to draw lessons from and use it.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;广东东莞市第二人民法院;
【基金】：西南政法大学校级科研项目《体育赛事转播的知识产权法律问题研究》(编号为:2016XZQN-05)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】