当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

不动产物权登记错误研究

发布时间:2018-05-08 12:01

  本文选题:不动产物权登记 + 不动产物权登记错误 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2015年硕士论文


【摘要】:我国物权法已于2007年10月1号开始实行。该法第九条规定:“不动产物权的设立、变更、转让和消灭,经依法登记,发生效力;未经登记,不发生效力,但法律另有规定的除外。”所以,在我国,不动产物权具有法律效应的评判标准即是否经过登记。不动产物权登记制度是我国物权法的重要制度,是公信原则的法律基础。不动产物权登记包括初始登记、变更登记、注销登记,同时对不动产权利进行限制的登记,包括法院查封、抵押登记等,笔者认为也都属于不动产物权登记的范畴。因此,在不动产物权登记过程中,审查登记申请人是否为真实权利人,协助司法部门进行查封、解封、强制过户,根据当事人申请进行抵押登记,等等,是登记部门的日常工作中广泛遇到的情况。可是即使工作态度严谨、制度过硬,在工作中也常常会遇到许多出乎意料的问题,可能会导致登记过程出现纰漏,给与之相关的人员带来损失。英国法彦说“没有救济就没有权利”。根据我国物权法第二十一条规定的内容,当事人若在登记过程中弄虚作假,损害他人利益的,应该做出相应的赔偿;由于登记错误造成的损失,其中包括对当事人和他人,那么登记部门应该做出相应的赔偿。登记部门承担责任之后,再自行归咎责任至造成登记错误的个人,然后索取赔偿。由法律规定可知,不动产物权登记出现问题时如何进行矫正和赔偿,是必须要思考和解决的问题。笔者是一名法律实务工作者,在司法实践中,有一些案例与不动产物权登记息息相关,比如农村宅基地使用权人和宅基地上建筑物所有人不一致、甲的房屋错误登记在乙的名下引发的纠纷;比如法院查封期限已到登记机关却不解封一定要求法院出具解封通知、在办理抵押登记时登记机关一定要求当事人确定抵押时间等做法是否具有法律依据。诸如此类问题,处理不妥,便引发行政诉讼、司法确权,同时也凸显法律规定的空白。因此,笔者在本文中,拟从实践出发,试着探讨一些不动产物权登记过程中发生的错误,并对错误发生后如何进行救济,以及没有法律规定的情况下如何处理?试着提出一些自己的建议和看法。
[Abstract]:China's real right law has been implemented on October 1, 2007. Article 9 of the Law states: "the establishment, alteration, transfer and elimination of real property rights shall be registered according to law and shall not have effect unless otherwise provided by law." Therefore, in our country, the real estate right has the legal effect judgment standard, namely whether through the registration. The registration system of real estate right is an important system of real right law of our country and the legal basis of the principle of public trust. Real property registration includes initial registration, change registration, cancellation registration, at the same time the registration of restrictions on real estate rights, including court seizure, mortgage registration, and so on, which are also considered to belong to the category of real property registration. Therefore, in the process of real estate property registration, we should examine whether the registration applicant is a true right holder, assist the judicial authorities in sealing up, unsealing, compulsory transfer of ownership, mortgage registration according to the application of the parties, and so on. It is a situation widely encountered in the daily work of the registration department. But even if the work attitude is strict and the system is perfect, there are often many unexpected problems in the work, which may lead to the mistakes in the registration process and the loss to the relevant personnel. Britain's Francois said "there is no right without relief". According to the provisions of Article 21 of the property Law of our country, if the parties engage in fraud in the registration process and damage the interests of others, they should make corresponding compensation; the losses caused by the registration errors include those to the parties and others, So the registration department should make the corresponding compensation. After the registration office has assumed responsibility, blame itself to the person who caused the registration error, and then claim compensation. According to the law, it is necessary to think about and solve the problem of how to correct and compensate for the problems in real estate registration. The author is a legal practice worker, in the judicial practice, there are some cases and real estate registration is closely related, such as rural homestead use right and home-based building owners are not consistent, For example, when the time limit for a court to seal a house has reached the registration authority, it must require the court to issue a notice of unseal. When handling mortgage registration, the registration authority must require the parties to determine whether the mortgage time has legal basis or not. Such problems, improper handling, will lead to administrative litigation, judicial confirmation, but also highlight the gaps in the law. Therefore, in this paper, the author intends to start from practice, try to explore some real estate registration process occurred in the error, and how to remedy the error after the occurrence, and how to deal with the situation without legal provisions? Try to put forward some of your own suggestions and ideas.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前1条

1 王富博;不动产登记瑕疵的法律救济——兼评《中华人民共和国物权法(草案)》的有关规定[J];法律适用;2005年02期



本文编号:1861313

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1861313.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户cd880***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com