意定代理授权行为无因性解析

发布时间：2018-05-11 03:18

本文选题：代理授权行为 + 无因性　；参考：《法学》2017年01期

【摘要】：我国立法并未承认代理授权行为无因性原则,司法实践中亦无以该无因性原则为依据作出的判决,部分学者主张通过表见代理制度实现授权行为无因性原则维护交易安全的制度功能。事实上,无论从制度基础与适用前提层面,还是从对交易安全的保护力度层面考察,授权行为无因性原则具有表见代理无法取代的制度优势。对于学者指出的该无因性原则会保护恶意相对人的弊端,可以通过禁止代理权滥用制度予以克服,相对人明知代理权滥用或因代理权滥用显而易见而不可能不知道代理权滥用的,不得向被代理人主张代理行为的效力。我国未来的《民法典》应当采纳授权行为无因性原则和禁止代理权滥用制度以全面保护交易安全及被代理人的利益。
[Abstract]:The legislation of our country does not recognize the principle of the uncausality of the act of agency authorization, and there is no judgment made on the basis of the principle of non-causality in judicial practice. Some scholars advocate the realization of the system function of transaction security by the principle of "apparent agency". In fact, whether from the system foundation and the applicable premise level, or from the level of the protection of transaction security, the principle of non-causality of authorized behavior has the institutional advantages that can not be replaced by apparent agency. This principle, which scholars have pointed out, will protect the malevolent counterpart, and can be overcome by prohibiting the abuse of the agency. If the relative party knows that the abuse of agency power is obvious or that it is impossible not to know the abuse of agency right, he shall not claim the validity of agency act to the principal. The future Civil Code of our country should adopt the principle of uncausality of authorized behavior and the prohibition of agency abuse system in order to protect the security of transactions and the interests of the principal in an all-round way.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学比较法学研究院中德法学研究所;
【基金】：中国政法大学校级项目“立法研究模式下法律行为分析”(16ZFG82007)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】