论并存的债务承担制度之构建

发布时间：2018-05-11 11:01

本文选题：构建 + 并存的债务承担　；参考：《中国海洋大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在经济全球化的大背景之下,日趋复杂的债权债务关系往往涉及第三人的利益,在此情况下,第三人参与债权债务关系的新模式应运而生----并存的债务承担。并存的债务承担作为债务承担的一种,因其易于混淆而备受争议,但是不管是从债务人的角度看,还是从债权人的角度看,亦或是从民法公平正义的角度看,并存的债务承担都有其存在的必要性。完善的债务承担制度不仅能够平衡债的关系各方当事人的利益,更能为全球化大背景下经济的发展创造良好的社会氛围。如何加快新形势下有关并存的债务承担制度的立法成为当务之急。想要清晰界定并存的债务承担,必须经过慎重分析。关于“并存的债务承担”,学界对其理解存在着诸多争议。对并存的债务承担的认定,应从保护债权人的利益出发,兼顾债务人、第三人的利益,保证相对公平。本文主要从三个角度研究了并存的债务承担制度：首先是对并存的债务承担制度的基本理论进行了阐述,在这一部分比较重要的是并存的债务承担的构成要件；然后是对并存的债务承担制度与其他相似的制度进行了辨析,辨析的目的是希望立法机关能够尽快将并存的债务承担制度单独立法,这样,就不会再和其他相似的制度发生混淆。第三人的行为对于债权人或者债务人是可能存在着风险的,所以必然要有十分严格的成立要求；最后明晰并存的债务承担制度社会价值,研究了并存的债务承担在成立后对原债权债务关系的效力以及对债权人、债务人和第三人的效力,在这个部分倾注了笔者的心血。研究此制度主要采取的是一种辨析的方法,即就并存的债务承担制度与其他相似的制度的具体内容加以阐述,然后分析异同点,从客观的角度出发,阐述出自己支持的观点或者提出新的观点,最后得出自己的结论。之所以研究并存的债务承担制度,是希望能够在前辈们的理论基础上寻求一个更加清晰的结论,同时,也希望能够为弥补立法空白提供一些有价值的参考建议,以后为这一制度在实践中的适用奠定坚实的基础。
[Abstract]:Under the background of economic globalization, the increasingly complex relationship between creditor's rights and liabilities often involves the interests of the third party. In this case, the new model of the third party's participation in the relationship of creditor's rights and liabilities emerges as the times require-the coexistence of debt commitment. As a kind of debt commitment, the coexistence of debt commitment is controversial because it is easy to be confused. However, it is not only from the perspective of the debtor, but also from the perspective of creditors, or from the perspective of justice and fairness of civil law. The coexistence of debt commitment has its necessity. A perfect debt bearing system can not only balance the interests of the parties involved in the debt, but also create a good social atmosphere for the economic development under the background of globalization. How to speed up the legislation on the coexistence of debt commitment system under the new situation has become an urgent matter. To clearly define a concurrent debt commitment, it must be carefully analyzed. There are many controversies on the understanding of the coexistence of debt commitment. The determination of the concurrent debt commitment should be based on the protection of the creditor's interests and the interests of the debtor and the third party to ensure relative fairness. This article mainly from three angles to study the coexistence of debt commitment system: first of all, the coexistence of debt commitment system of the basic theory is expounded, in this part of the more important is the coexistence of debt commitment elements; The purpose of the analysis is to hope that the legislature can legislate the coexistence of the debt commitment system as soon as possible, so that the existing debt commitment system can be separately legislated as soon as possible. There would be no more confusion with other similar systems. The behavior of the third party is likely to be risky for the creditor or debtor, so there must be very strict requirements for its establishment; finally, the social value of the debt bearing system, which exists in clear coexistence, This paper studies the effectiveness of the existing debt commitment on the original creditor's rights and liabilities and on the creditors, the debtor and the third party. In this part, the author puts his efforts into it. The research on this system mainly adopts a discriminative method, that is, the concrete contents of the existing debt commitment system and other similar systems are expounded, and then the similarities and differences are analyzed, and the objective point of view is analyzed. State your own views or put forward new ideas, and finally draw your own conclusions. The reason for the study of the existing debt commitment system is to seek a clearer conclusion on the basis of the previous generation's theory, and at the same time, to provide some valuable reference suggestions for bridging the legislative gaps. In the future, it will lay a solid foundation for the application of this system in practice.
【学位授予单位】：中国海洋大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】