当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

标准必要专利持有人滥用市场支配地位的法律规制研究

发布时间:2018-05-12 04:27

  本文选题:标准必要专利 + 滥用市场支配地位 ; 参考:《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:专利标准化进程中,虽然标准的实施更加规范科学,但是标准必要专利持有人难免有滥用市场支配地位的嫌疑。如何减少标准实施过程中产生的反竞争效果是反垄断执法机构及司法机构的重要任务。本文主要分为四个部分。第一章首先界定标准必要专利的概念及其最根本的性质在于标准必要专利具有私益和公益的统一性,随后明确有必要对标准必要专利持有人滥用市场支配地位垄断行为进行法律规制,最后分析我国标准必要专利持有人滥用市场支配地位的法律现状,并且从三个经典案例为核心论述实践运用。第二章是本文的重点,在第一章的基础上,揭示我国对规制标准必要专持有人滥用市场支配地位现存的种种问题,主要表现在认定标准必要专利具有市场支配地位的要件不统一、FRAND原则的内涵模糊、法律规定不充分三个方面。第三章主要比较欧盟和美国对标准必要专利持有人滥用市场支配地位法律规制的立法现状和实践案例运用,并希望对我国标准必要专利滥用市场支配地位的法律规制有所启示。第四章针对前文我国在标准必要专利持有人滥用市场支配地位法律规制方面的存在问题提出完善建议,诸如制定我国知识产权领域反垄断执法指南、静态动态综合界定标准必要专利相关市场、明确相关市场竞争状况和进入障碍作为认定市场支配地位的考量因素等建议,以期推动标准必要专利滥用市场支配地位的相关立法和实践发展。
[Abstract]:In the process of patent standardization, although the implementation of the standard is more standardized and scientific, the necessary patent holder of the standard is bound to abuse the dominant position of the market. How to reduce the anti-competitive effect is an important task for anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies and judicial institutions. This paper is divided into four parts. The first chapter first defines the concept of standard essential patent and its most fundamental nature is that the standard essential patent has the unity of private interest and public good. Then it is clear that it is necessary to regulate the monopoly behavior of the standard essential patent holder abusing the dominant position of the market, and finally analyze the legal status quo of the abuse of the dominant position of the standard essential patent holder in our country. And from three classic cases as the core of practical application. The second chapter is the focal point of this paper, on the basis of the first chapter, it reveals the existing problems of the abuse of market dominant position by the necessary exclusive holder of the regulation standard in our country. It is mainly shown in three aspects that the essential patent of standard has market dominant position and the connotation of FRAND principle is vague and the legal provisions are not sufficient. The third chapter mainly compares the current legislative situation and the practical application of the legal regulation of the abuse of the market dominant position by the standard essential patent holders in the European Union and the United States, and hopes to enlighten the legal regulation of the abuse of the market dominant position of the standard essential patents in China. The fourth chapter puts forward some suggestions on the legal regulation of the abuse of market dominant position by standard essential patent holders in China, such as the formulation of anti-monopoly law enforcement guidelines in the field of intellectual property rights in China. Static and dynamic comprehensive definition of the standard necessary patent related markets, clear related market competition and barriers to entry as the market dominant position of the consideration factors, In order to promote the standard necessary patent abuse market dominant position related legislation and practice development.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.294;D923.42

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 罗蓉蓉;;经营者承诺制度在技术标准化反垄断中的适用[J];法学杂志;2016年04期

2 杨亦晨;杨遂全;;论专利相关不公平高价认定方法的完善——以高通案与华为诉交互数字案为视角[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2016年04期

3 尹雪萍;;标准必要专利禁令之诉的竞争法边界——以欧盟2015年华为诉中兴案为视角[J];东岳论丛;2016年04期

4 丁茂中;;论专利高价许可的反垄断规制[J];知识产权;2016年03期

5 韩伟;徐美玲;;标准必要专利禁令行为的反垄断规制探析[J];知识产权;2016年01期

6 林秀芹;刘禹;;标准必要专利的反垄断法规制——兼与欧美实践经验对话[J];知识产权;2015年12期

7 王晓晔;;标准必要专利反垄断诉讼问题研究[J];中国法学;2015年06期

8 朱战威;;垄断语境下标准必要专利许可费之厘定——兼评“高通案”专利许可费的裁决[J];价格理论与实践;2015年11期

9 李丹;;滥用标准必要专利的反垄断法规制[J];价格理论与实践;2015年10期

10 董新凯;;标准必要专利持有人市场支配地位认定的考量因素[J];知识产权;2015年08期

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 林冬豫;标准必要专利许可中的F/RAND原则及其适用[D];华南理工大学;2015年

2 朱文慧;标准必要专利滥用的法律规制研究[D];华东政法大学;2015年

3 周林成;标准必要专利的禁令救济研究[D];厦门大学;2014年



本文编号:1877095

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1877095.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户82bcf***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com