论发表权的“行使”——以发表权的权能构造为切入点

发布时间：2018-05-15 00:44

本文选题：发表权 + 权能构造　；参考：《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2015年06期

【摘要】：发表权的"行使"问题具有重要的现实意义,仍值得深入研究。发表权不同于发表,发表本身不以作者的意思表示为构成要件。从权能构造来看,发表权在积极权能上具有一次性权利作用效力,同时注重积极权能上的"行"和消极权能上的"禁"两方面,故发表权的"行使"应包括双层涵义。发表权"行使"中的一次用尽原则存在语境限制。通过对发表权权能构造的深入认识,可以更好地理解特定作品及视觉艺术作品原件转让产生之发表权限制的法律性质。就遗作而言,应灵活阐释其发表权的归属和行使问题。现行法在遗作发表权"行使"和"保护"的关系处理以及行使主体等设计安排上缺乏逻辑自洽性,有必要在著作权法第三次全面修订当中进一步完善。
[Abstract]:The issue of the exercise of the right of publication is of great practical significance and is still worthy of further study. The right of publication is different from that of publication, and publication itself does not consist of the author's intention. According to the construction of power, the right of publication has the effect of one-off right on the positive power, and pays attention to the two aspects of "action" and "prohibition" on the positive power and negative power, so the "exercise" of the right of publication should include two meanings. The principle of exhaustion in the exercise of the right of publication has contextual limitations. Through a deep understanding of the construction of the right to publish, we can better understand the legal nature of the limitation of the right of publication arising from the transfer of the original parts of a particular work and a visual art work. As far as the posthumous works are concerned, the attribution and exercise of their publishing rights should be interpreted flexibly. The present law lacks logical self-consistency in dealing with the relationship between "exercise" and "protection" of the right of publication and the subject of exercise, so it is necessary to further perfect it in the third comprehensive revision of copyright Law.
【作者单位】：苏州大学王健法学院;
【基金】：教育部高校人文社科研究青年基金项目(13YJC820048)
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】