论优先权的性质及其立法定位
发布时间:2018-05-15 10:23
本文选题:优先权 + 性质 ; 参考:《郑州大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:在我国物权法出台之前,学者对于应不应当确定优先权制度曾经有过激烈的讨论。最终物权法并未涉及优先权制度,主要原因是对优先权的性质认识不够清晰,从而难以确定它的立法定位。本文首先从优先权的概念界定出发。对优先权的不同称谓和不同内涵进行分析,并研究优先权在各种法律历史上的发展嬗变,找出优先权的核心内涵。在此基础上结合我国目前社会状况,对优先权理论进行净化梳理,提出我们目前应建立的优先权概念实际上是指一般优先权。在厘清概念的前提下进一步分析优先权的性质。提出优先权是一项独立的权利,是一项实体性的权利。但是,其既非债权,亦非物权,而是一种“保护权利的权利”,即救济性权利,在性质上应属于形成权。接下来分析优先权的立法定位。首先明确了建立统一优先权制度的意义。之后根据优先权的性质,认为它不宜规定在物权或者债权部分。应当在总则中增设权利的保护部分,并将统一优先权制度纳入其中。最后结合我国现实及学者建议提出了我国所应建立的优先权制度的理论框架。
[Abstract]:Before the enactment of property Law in China, scholars had a heated discussion on whether to determine the priority system. The main reason is that the nature of priority is not clear enough, so it is difficult to determine its legislative position. This paper begins with the definition of priority. This paper analyzes the different appellations and connotations of priority, studies the development and evolution of priority in various legal history, and finds out the core connotation of priority. On this basis, combining the current social situation of our country, the theory of priority is purified and combed, and the concept of priority that we should establish at present is actually referring to the general priority. On the premise of clarifying the concept, the nature of priority is further analyzed. Putting forward priority is an independent right and a substantive right. However, it is neither a creditor's right nor a real right, but a "right to protect rights", that is, the right of relief, which belongs to the right of formation in nature. Then it analyzes the legislative orientation of priority. First of all, the significance of establishing a unified priority system is clarified. Then according to the nature of priority, it should not be stipulated in real right or creditor's rights. The protection of rights should be added to the general principles and the uniform priority system should be included. Finally, the theoretical framework of the priority system is put forward according to the reality of our country and the suggestions of the scholars.
【学位授予单位】:郑州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 申卫星;我国优先权制度立法研究[J];法学评论;1997年06期
2 于海涌;;法国抵押权和优先权的公示制度研究[J];私法;2004年02期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 鲍轶欣;民事优先权性质研究[D];中国政法大学;2008年
,本文编号:1892070
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1892070.html