“e代驾”服务中的民事法律问题探究

发布时间：2018-05-15 12:56

本文选题：“e代驾”服务 + 不规则雇佣关系　；参考：《沈阳师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：“e代驾”是一款用于寻找代驾的便捷手机应用。“e代驾”软件运营公司将需要代驾的客户信息提供给代驾司机,其接单后依照被代驾人的要求到达指定位置并驾驶被代驾人的车辆将被代驾人及车辆安全送至目的地,后获得报酬并按要求支付软运营公司20%的信息费用。新型网络代驾给人们生活带来了便利的同时我们也应看见其在法律上面临的困境:因立法空白,现实中此类案件的司法判决不尽相同。“e代驾”服务中代驾司机、软件运营公司和被代驾人三者之间的法律关系及责任认定则成为判决的重要依据。本文从三个方面论述“e代驾”服务涉及的法律问题:在充分理解两个典型案件的基础之上,简要介绍由“e代驾”服务所引发的关于劳动争议和交通事故责任纠纷的案件,并通过分析案件事实及判决依据得出争议焦点,即“e代驾”服务中软件运营公司与代驾司机、被代驾人之间法律关系的性质分别是什么;发生交通事故时责任如何承担。在论述代驾司机与软件运营公司之间的关系上,首先对其他学者提出的劳动关系说、雇佣关系说进行分析探讨,在论述两种关系基本内涵、认定标准的基础之上,提出其与“e代驾”服务中双方关系不符,双方实质是一种不规则雇佣关系的观点。进一步论述何谓不规则雇佣关系,此类关系如何认定以及如何适用法律的问题。在论述软件运营公司与被代驾人的法律关系性质上,对其他学者提出的委托关系说、居间关系说予以分析探讨,他们都与“e代驾”服务中双方关系不符,双方实质是一种承揽关系的观点及原因。在以各方之间法律关系性质明确和现有法律的基础之上,分析在发生交通责任事故时,不同受害主体的责任承担:代驾司机受到损害时,软件运营公司应承担的雇员受害责任。被代驾人受到损害时,软件运营公司应承担的雇主替代责任、违约责任以及第三人的侵权责任。第三人受到损害时,软件运营公司承担责任的法律适用问题以及为何不需要被代驾人承担责任的主要依据。综合以上讨论,明确“e代驾”所涉及的一系列法律问题,为此类问题的解决提供理论参考。
[Abstract]:E generation driving is a convenient mobile phone application for finding a proxy driver. The "e behalf driving" software operator provides customer information to the driver who needs to drive on behalf. After receiving the order, the vehicle will be delivered to the destination safely by the acting driver and the vehicle will be sent to the destination according to the requirements of the acting driver, and will be paid 20% of the information fee of the soft operating company as required. At the same time, we should also see the legal dilemma it faces: because of the blank legislation, the judicial decision of this kind of case is different in reality. The legal relationship and responsibility between the software operating company and the acting driver become the important basis of the judgment. This paper discusses the legal problems involved in "e-generation driving" service from three aspects: on the basis of fully understanding two typical cases, this paper briefly introduces the cases of labor disputes and traffic accident liability disputes caused by "e-generation driving" service. Through the analysis of the facts of the case and the basis of the judgment, the dispute focus is drawn, that is, what is the nature of the legal relationship between the software operating company and the acting driver in the "e-acting driving" service, and how to bear the responsibility in the event of traffic accident. On the basis of discussing the relationship between the driver and the software operating company, this paper analyzes and discusses the labor relation theory and employment relation theory put forward by other scholars, on the basis of discussing the basic connotation of the two kinds of relationship and determining the standard. It points out that the relationship between the two parties is not in accordance with the "e generation driving" service, and that the two parties are in essence an irregular employment relationship. Further discusses what is irregular employment relationship, how to determine such relationship and how to apply the law. On the basis of discussing the nature of the legal relationship between the software operating company and the acting driver, this paper analyzes and discusses the principal-relationship theory and the intermediate-relationship theory put forward by other scholars, and they all do not agree with the relationship between the two parties in the "e-acting driving" service. The essence of both parties is the viewpoint and reason of a contract relationship. On the basis of the clear nature of the legal relationship between the parties and the existing laws, this paper analyzes the liability of different injured subjects in the event of a traffic accident: the employee victimization liability of the software operation company when the driver is injured. In case of damage to the acting driver, the software operating company shall bear the employer's substitution liability, the liability for breach of contract and the tort liability of the third party. When the third party is injured, the application of the law to the liability of the software operating company and the main basis of why the liability is not required for the driver. By synthesizing the above discussion, this paper clarifies a series of legal problems involved in e-behalf driving, and provides a theoretical reference for the solution of such problems.
【学位授予单位】：沈阳师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】