公知常识的认定:一个命题的误读和澄清

发布时间：2018-05-17 14:36

  本文选题：公知常识 + 创造性　； 参考：《电子知识产权》2017年03期

【摘要】：专利法律法规缺少公知常识的明确定义以及仅从来源角度对公知常识的栽体进行开放式的列举,造成了公知常识认定的随意性及模糊性。以栽体来源作为认定公知常识的判断标准是业界的普遍做法,但却是对"公知常识的认定"的误读。回归创造性判断的基本框架内,将"公知常识的认定"与"创造性判断"有机联系,充分考量创造性判断中各种实质性要素对认定公知常识的影响,构建并适用"技术领域——技术问题——技术启示"的认定标准,才能正确地认定公知常识。
[Abstract]:The lack of a clear definition of common knowledge in patent laws and regulations and the open enumeration of common knowledge only from the source point of view result in the arbitrariness and fuzziness of common knowledge. It is a common practice in the industry to judge common knowledge by using the source of planting body as the judgment standard, but it is a misreading of the recognition of common knowledge. Return to the basic frame of creative judgment, link "common sense of public knowledge" with "creative judgment" organically, and fully consider the influence of various substantive elements in creative judgment on the recognition of common knowledge. Only by constructing and applying the standard of "technical field-technical problem-technological enlightenment" can we correctly identify common knowledge.
【作者单位】： 华诚律师事务所;
【分类号】：D923.42
，

本文编号：1901760