特殊动产物权变动中登记对抗规则问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-18 04:23

本文选题：特殊动产 + 登记对抗　；参考：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：特殊动产物权变动中的登记对抗效力,源于法律的直接规定,内涵为第三人对未登记的特殊动产物权变动享有否定权,即该物权变动效力仅产生于交易双方之间,无法约束第三方。登记对抗规则中的第三人范围应是期望取得或是设定某一物权的一方当事人,对于第三人主观善意的解读可适当降低标准,采用推定善意规则,凡是存在第三人单纯知情交易关系但未有恶意欺诈(不正当竞争)减损前手物权受让人之利益者,均认定为善意第三人,以实现与登记对抗中的法定登记义务相契合。登记对抗的效力规则在某种程度上可视其为一种特殊的物权变动方式,但应严格限定在法律明确规定下适用,不允许任意扩张解释适用。法律在设置第三人否定权的同时,对于否定权行使的法律效果未明确规定,若不加区分,主张扩展登记对抗的适用空间涵盖处理物权的归属,势必与我国现有的法律制度处理此情形下物权归属的配置产生冲突。
[Abstract]:The registration countervailing effect in the real right change of special movable property originates from the direct stipulation of the law, and the connotation is that the third party has the negative right to the change of the special movable property right which is not registered, that is, the effect of the change of the property right only arises between the parties to the transaction. A third party cannot be bound. The scope of the third party in the registration countermeasures rule should be the party who expects to acquire or create a real right. The interpretation of the third party's subjective good will can appropriately lower the standard and adopt the presumption of good faith rule. Anyone who has a relationship of pure informed transaction but no malicious fraud (unfair competition) detracts from the interests of the transferee of the former real right is regarded as a bona fide third party in order to realize the agreement with the legal registration obligation in the registration confrontation. To a certain extent, the rules of effectiveness of registration countermeasures can be regarded as a special mode of real right change, but they should be strictly limited to the specific provisions of the law, and no arbitrary expansion of interpretation should be allowed. While the law sets up the third party's right of negation, the legal effect of the exercise of the right of negation is not clearly stipulated. If no distinction is made, it is advocated to expand the applicable space of registration confrontation to cover the ownership of the real right. It is bound to conflict with the disposition of property ownership in the present legal system of our country.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】