微博名誉侵权法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-18 19:23

本文选题：微博 + 微博名誉　；参考：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：与传统的名誉权相比较,其实微博名誉权并不算新的东西,二者没有什么实质性的差别。微博以互联网为载体,造就了它传播速度快,影响范围广的特点,同时也带来了侵权的便利性,近年来微博名誉侵权案件层出不穷。在法律适用上,没有一个专门的立法对其加以规制,总是援引相关的法律法规,但是这些法规并不能明确界定是否是侵权行为,在司法实践中法官也没有一个明确的判案依据,导致微博侵权法律适用陷入一个尴尬的境地。这种情况下,我们应该如何寻找出路?面对此种局面,笔者尝试尝试由浅入深,逐步展开对微博名誉权保护的讨论。论文第一章为绪论部分,主要介绍了论文研究的背景及意义、国内外文献综述、主要研究内容和创新点等。第二章从一个案例着手,引出一些个人见解。第三章对微博名誉权一些基本的问题进行讨论,为后文的研究提供了铺垫,同时还探讨了微博名誉侵权的诸多原因等。第四章详细地分析论证了微博名誉侵权的责任认定与承担等问题。第五章重点对比国内外微博名誉侵权的立法规制,细致分析了适用于传统意义的名誉侵权行为的法律不适用微博侵权的尴尬局面。最后,借鉴国外关于微博名誉权保护的一些相关立法和理论,进而提出对我国微博名誉侵权保护的完善。
[Abstract]:Compared with the traditional right of reputation, the right of reputation of Weibo is not new, there is no substantial difference between them. With the Internet as the carrier, Weibo has the characteristics of fast spreading speed and wide range of influence. At the same time, it also brings the convenience of infringement. In recent years, Weibo reputation infringement cases emerge in endlessly. In the application of the law, there is no special legislation to regulate it, and the relevant laws and regulations are always invoked. However, these laws and regulations can not clearly define whether it is an act of infringement, nor does the judge have a clear basis for adjudicating a case in judicial practice. As a result, Weibo tort law application into an awkward situation. Under such circumstances, how should we find a way out? Facing this situation, the author tries to discuss the protection of Weibo reputation from shallow to deep. The first chapter is the introduction, which mainly introduces the background and significance of the research, the literature review at home and abroad, the main research content and innovation. The second chapter starts with a case and leads to some personal opinions. The third chapter discusses some basic issues of Weibo right of reputation, which provides the foundation for the later research, and also discusses the reasons of Weibo reputation infringement. The fourth chapter analyzes and demonstrates the responsibility of Weibo reputation infringement in detail. The fifth chapter focuses on the comparison of domestic and foreign Weibo reputation infringement legislation regulations, carefully analyzes the traditional meaning of reputation tort law does not apply to Weibo tort embarrassing situation. At last, we draw lessons from some relevant legislation and theories about the protection of Weibo reputation right in foreign countries, and then put forward the perfection of the protection of Weibo reputation infringement in our country.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】