我国涉外贴牌生产中的商标侵权问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-19 20:12

  本文选题：涉外贴牌生产 + 商标使用　； 参考：《华侨大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国的经济发展现状决定了涉外贴牌生产的存在,但与之相关的商标侵权纠纷却成为其中的风险因素。其典型的纠纷情形为:在涉外贴牌生产中,如果所加工贴附着的商标,在国内相同或类似商品上已经有相同或类似的注册商标,那么国内的商标权利人往往会对贴牌生产厂商提出商标侵权指控。我国的理论界和实务界关于贴牌生产厂商的商标贴附加工行为是否构成商标侵权,一直有着不同的态度,这类判决的不确定性很大程度阻碍了我国贴牌生产产业的发展。随着2013年《商标法》的修订出台及一些解读文章的发表,可以说方向在逐渐明朗化,但仍然未出台正式的司法解释。针对于此,本文进行了深入的分析,并在此基础上提出了自己的观点。本文的主要内容有四部分:除了引言,第一部分简述了贴牌生产的概念及其法律性质,通过同案不同判的案例引出目前对涉外贴牌生产是否构成商标侵权的完全相反的观点及争议焦点;第二部分,比较论证域外相关规定和判例,总结域外类似规定及法理依据;第三部分,分析我国涉外贴牌生产中的商标侵权判定的理论依据,包括商标侵权的归责原则和商标侵权的构成要件,着重分析商标法上“使用”这一概念和混淆可能性原则,提出商标是否构成“使用”应该根据作用对象不同而有所区分的观点,认为贴牌生产不构成对国内商标专用权的侵犯,并指明我国涉外贴牌审判实务中存在的不足之处;第四部分,针对我国法律的滞后以及实践中的缺失,提出完善相关法律和改进执法制度的建议,最后是结语。
[Abstract]:The status quo of China's economic development determines the existence of foreign label production, but the related trademark infringement disputes become the risk factor. The typical disputes are as follows: in the production of foreign stickers, if the trademark that is processed and affixed to it already has the same or similar registered trademark on the same or similar goods in the country, Then the domestic trademark owners often put forward trademark infringement charges against the manufacturers. There have always been different attitudes in the theoretical and practical circles on whether the trademark affixing and processing behavior of the label manufacturers constitutes trademark infringement. The uncertainty of this kind of judgment greatly hinders the development of the label industry in our country. With the revision of the Trademark Law in 2013 and the publication of some reading articles, it can be said that the direction is becoming more and more clear, but there is still no formal judicial interpretation. In view of this, this article carries on the thorough analysis, and puts forward own viewpoint on this basis. The main contents of this paper are as follows: in addition to the introduction, the first part briefly describes the concept and legal nature of label production. Through the case of different judgments in the same case, the author draws the opposite view and the focus of dispute about whether the production of foreign label is the infringement of trademark. The second part, compares and demonstrates the relevant provisions and precedents, summarizes the similar provisions and legal basis of the foreign countries. The third part analyzes the theoretical basis of trademark infringement judgment in the production of foreign label, including the principle of imputation of trademark infringement and the constitutive elements of trademark infringement, focusing on the concept of "use" and the possibility of confusion in trademark law. The author points out that whether trademark constitutes "use" should be differentiated according to the different objects of action, thinks that the production of trademark does not constitute an infringement of the exclusive right of trademark in China, and points out the deficiencies in the trial practice of foreign trademark stickers in our country. The fourth part, aiming at the lag of our country's law and the deficiency in practice, puts forward some suggestions to perfect the relevant laws and improve the law enforcement system, and finally, the conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：华侨大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.43
，

本文编号：1911472