大型发电设备采购合同法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-20 08:44

本文选题：大型发电设备 + 合同　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：发电设备为人类生存及经济发展提供动力支撑,大型发电设备制造属于高端装备制造行业,影响到整个国家的经济安全、军事安全。这类设备采购合同具有法律性质特殊、合同标的额大、卖方瑕疵担保责任巨大等法律特点。违约金制度因其数额明确,操作性强,使争议的双方能够及时便捷的解决矛盾,成为民事主体在市场交易中被广泛使用的争议解决手段,在大型发电设备采购合同中也不例外。此类合同一般都约定违约金条款,尤其是对卖方的质量赔款都约定最高限额,但由于我国法律允许当事人在诉讼(仲裁)过程中申请对违约金数额进行调整,双方就违约金或损害赔偿金的赔付数额上容易产生争议,进而导致纠纷的产生,尤其在约定违约金低于实际损失时,简单机械的适用法律可能导致显失公平。本文通过对具体案例分析,针对司法干预违约金制度在大型发电设备采购合同中的运用提出相关建议。本文分为五个部分,第一部分案情以及双方争议焦点问题。第二部分主要介绍大型发电设备采购合同的特点,指出这类合同的在违约金设定方面的特殊性。第三部分主要论述关于司法干预违约金制度相关规定、理论基础,司法干预违约金制度调整的提起、条件、限制以及违约金和损害赔偿能否共用的问题。第四部分论述司法干预违约金制度在大型发电设备采购合同的适用。第五部分对司法审判工作提出相关建议。最后结语,对文章进行简要总结。
[Abstract]:Power generation equipment provides power support for human survival and economic development. Large-scale power generation equipment manufacturing belongs to the high-end equipment manufacturing industry, which affects the economic security and military security of the whole country. This kind of equipment purchase contract has the special legal nature, the contract subject matter is large, the seller's defect guarantee liability is huge and so on. Because of its clear amount and strong maneuverability, the system of liquidated damages has made both parties to the dispute resolve their contradictions promptly and conveniently, and become a means of dispute settlement widely used by civil subjects in market transactions, and it is no exception in the procurement contracts for large-scale power generation equipment. Such contracts generally agree on the terms of liquidated damages, especially on the maximum amount of the seller's quality indemnities. However, since the law of our country allows the parties to apply for adjustment of the amount of liquidated damages in the course of litigation (arbitration), It is easy to dispute the amount of damages for breach of contract or damages, which leads to disputes, especially when the agreed penalty is lower than the actual loss, the applicable law of simple machinery may lead to obvious inequity. Based on the analysis of specific cases, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the application of judicial intervention penalty system in large power equipment procurement contracts. This article is divided into five parts, the first part of the case and the focus of dispute between the two sides. The second part mainly introduces the characteristics of large power generation equipment purchase contract and points out the particularity of this kind of contract in setting penalty for breach of contract. The third part mainly discusses the relevant provisions of the judicial intervention penalty system, the theoretical basis, the institution of the adjustment of the judicial intervention penalty system, conditions, restrictions and whether the liquidated damages and damages can be shared. The fourth part discusses the application of judicial intervention penalty system in large-scale power generation equipment purchase contract. The fifth part puts forward the relevant suggestions to the administration of justice. Finally, the conclusion, a brief summary of the article.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】