版权禁令救济无限制适用的反思与调适

发布时间：2018-05-20 09:25

本文选题：版权 + 禁令救济　；参考：《法商研究》2016年03期

【摘要】：根据《中华人民共和国著作权法》第48条的规定,在认定侵权事实成立的情况下,法院应当"根据情况"支持原告的禁令救济请求。然而实践中存在着版权禁令救济无限制适用的现象,即只要行为被认定为侵权且仍在持续中,禁令救济请求几乎都能被支持,而针对禁令救济所设置的限制性条件难以发挥作用。"排他权"属性在裁判者思维中根深蒂固、赔偿救济的潜力无法充分释放等是版权禁令救济无限制适用现象存在的内在原因。禁令救济与关系型版权结构难以兼容,不加限制地适用禁令救济会加大作品后续创作渠道被阻滞的风险、助推投机性版权诉讼的出现以及阻碍作品的有效利用。为此我们可以通过充分发挥财产性救济的替代功能来弱化版权禁令救济无限制适用的内在动力。版权实践中应存在着调适性适用的禁令救济,调适的维度包括强化诉讼动机的考量、提高作品的公益性判断标准以及关注禁令救济的效力范围等方面。
[Abstract]:According to Article 48 of the copyright Law of the people's Republic of China, if the facts of infringement are established, the court shall support the plaintiff's request for injunction relief "according to the circumstances". However, in practice, there exists the phenomenon of unlimited application of copyright injunction relief, that is, as long as the act is recognized as infringement and continues, almost all the injunction relief requests can be supported. And the restrictive conditions set up for injunction relief are difficult to play a role. " The nature of exclusive right is deeply rooted in the referee's thinking, and the potential of compensation and relief can not be fully released, which is the inherent reason for the existence of unlimited application of copyright prohibition relief. Prohibition relief and relational copyright structure are difficult to be compatible. The application of prohibition relief without restriction will increase the risk that the channel of subsequent creation of works will be blocked, promote the emergence of speculative copyright litigation and hinder the effective use of works. Therefore, we can weaken the inherent motive force of the unlimited application of copyright prohibition relief by giving full play to the substitute function of property relief. In the practice of copyright, there should be injunctive relief for adaptation. The dimensions of adaptation include strengthening consideration of litigation motive, improving the judgment standard of public welfare of works, and paying close attention to the scope of effectiveness of injunction relief.
【作者单位】：郑州大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(11JJD820006)
【分类号】：D923.41

【相似文献】