关于民法总则中时效制度立法的思考

发布时间：2018-05-22 17:22

本文选题：时效制度 + 诉讼时效　；参考：《法学论坛》2017年01期

【摘要】：时效制度是民法总则的重要内容。各种时效制度在性质和功能上有同一性,应于总则中统一规定。这也是有立法例的。时效制度的设计,应考虑相互间的协调、衔接。民法总则草案规定了诉讼时效和除斥期间,还应当规定取得时效和权利失效期间。时效制度的构建应注意内部规则的协调。诉讼时效期间是权利人请求法律保护的法定期间,权利人提起诉讼或者申请仲裁经受理进入诉讼程序或仲裁程序的,不发生诉讼时效期间的重新开始,而发生诉讼时效期间的终结。权利人保护权利的请求并非全受诉讼时效限制。人身权的保护不应受诉讼时效的限制,权利人请求保护的权利有关基本生存利益以及涉及他人利益的,权利人的请求也不应受诉讼时效的限制。
[Abstract]:Prescription system is an important part of the general principles of civil law. All kinds of prescription system are identical in nature and function and should be unified in the general principles. There is also legislation. The design of the prescription system should consider the coordination and convergence of each other. The draft of the civil law stipulates the limitation period and the exclusion period, as well as the limitation period and the invalidation period. Attention should be paid to the coordination of internal rules in the construction of prescription system. The period of limitation of action is the legal period for the obligee to request legal protection. If the obligee initiates an action or applies for arbitration and enters into the litigation or arbitration proceedings after accepting the action, there shall not be a fresh start of the period of limitation of action, And the end of the limitation period. The obligee's request for protection is not entirely subject to the limitation of action. The protection of personal rights should not be limited by the limitation of action. If the rights of the obligee request protection are related to the basic survival interests and the interests of others, the obligee's request should not be limited by the limitation of action.
【作者单位】：山东大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】