论侵权法律选择的发展方向与价值导向

发布时间：2018-05-24 05:40

本文选题：侵权冲突法 + 传统原则　；参考：《南昌大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：自13世纪伊始,侵权法律的选择与适用一直在欧美国际冲突法理论领域占有着举足轻重的地位,而在13世纪到20世纪前半叶的这段时间里伴随着司法实践的历史脚步也出现了形形色色的理论,尤其是到了20世纪80年代,无论是侵权法律选择与适用的理论抑或实践都取得了巨大的发展和进步,到当代为止,我们有必要对欧美侵权法律选择与适用的发展历程做一个梳理,并且通过这个认知过程对传统和现当代的理论实践进行比较评析,从而分析欧美各国在侵权法律选择与适用的发展方向以及在价值导向上的转变。本文主要从四个部分着手讨论涉外侵权法律的选择与适用。第一部分通过涉猎欧美侵权法律选择的传统原则来认识当时欧美各国在侵权法律选择上的价值导向,主要涵盖侵权行为地法原则、法院地法原则、重叠适用与双重可诉原则。第二部分主要讨论现代欧美侵权法律选择的方法,由于美国在现代侵权法律选择理论界拥有不可忽视的重要作用,在此首先我们要认识美国现代侵权冲突适用的理论变革与规范构建,其次欧洲的地位更是不可替代,所以我们接着讨论英国和大陆法系国家在侵权法律选择理论的现代化。第三部分在基于前两部分对欧美侵权法律选择传统和现代的认识,分析当代侵权法律选择的发展方向和价值导向。第四部分,也是最后一个部分,主要是通过认识我国在侵权法律选择理论的历史与实践,同时在最新的《法律适用法》颁布之后对其进行分析与评判,结合欧美当代理论发展的新方向和价值导向,进而对我国的侵权法律选择规范的做出必要的思考和提出中肯的建议。
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of the 13th century, the choice and application of tort law has been playing an important role in the field of international conflict law in Europe and America. And during the period from the 13th century to the first half of the 20th century, there was a variety of theories along with the historical steps of judicial practice, especially in the 1980s. No matter the theory or practice of the choice and application of tort law has made great development and progress, it is necessary for us to sort out the course of development of the choice and application of tort law in Europe and the United States. And through this cognitive process to the traditional and contemporary theory and practice of comparative analysis, so as to analyze the European and American countries in the choice of tort law and the application of the direction of development as well as the value orientation of the transformation. This paper mainly discusses the choice and application of foreign tort law from four parts. The first part is to understand the value orientation of tort law choice in Europe and the United States through the traditional principles of tort law choice in Europe and the United States at that time, mainly covering the principles of tort Lex Fori, the principle of forum law, the principle of overlapping application and the principle of dual actionable law. The second part mainly discusses the methods of tort law choice in modern Europe and America, because the United States plays an important role in modern tort law choice theory. First of all, we should understand the theoretical change and norm construction of modern tort conflict in the United States, and the status of Europe is irreplaceable, so we then discuss the modernization of the choice of tort law theory in the United Kingdom and civil law countries. The third part is based on the first two parts of the European and American tort law choice tradition and modern understanding, analysis of contemporary tort law choice development direction and value orientation. The fourth part is the last part, mainly through the understanding of the history and practice of tort law choice theory in our country, at the same time, after the promulgation of the latest applicable Law of Law, it is analyzed and judged. Combined with the new direction and value orientation of contemporary theories in Europe and the United States, this paper makes necessary thinking and puts forward some pertinent suggestions on the norms of tort law choice in our country.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】