预期违约制度考察分析

发布时间：2018-05-30 10:11

  本文选题：预期违约 + 不安抗辩权　； 参考：《东岳论丛》2017年10期

【摘要】：为了保护合同期待权,英美法系国家中建立了预期违约制度,而在大陆法系国家中则相应地实行了不安抗辩权制度。我国则借鉴和吸收了英美法系当中的预期违约制度,沿用了大陆法系当中的基本框架。我国法律规定对这两种制度进行了相应的融合,确立了具有中国特色的预期违约制度。但是我国预期违约制度的规定还不够成熟,法官有时会因为没有相应的法律规定而采取故意推迟裁判的方式。针对我国立法中的不足,我们需要对预期违约制度进行进一步的探讨与研究。
[Abstract]:In order to protect the right of expectation of contract, the system of anticipatory breach of contract has been established in common law countries, and the system of uneasiness right of defense has been implemented accordingly in countries of civil law system. Our country draws lessons from and absorbs the system of anticipatory breach of contract in Anglo-American law system, and follows the basic frame of civil law system. The law of our country combines the two systems and establishes the system of anticipatory breach of contract with Chinese characteristics. However, the system of anticipatory breach of contract in our country is not mature enough. Judges sometimes adopt the method of deliberately postponing the decision because there is no corresponding legal regulation. In view of the shortcomings of our legislation, we need to further explore and study the system of anticipatory breach of contract.
【作者单位】： 山东社会科学院《东岳论丛》编辑部;
【分类号】：D923.6
，

本文编号：1954910