论知假买假的逻辑基

发布时间：2018-06-03 08:27

本文选题：知假买假 + 消费者　；参考：《当代法学》2016年06期

【摘要】：最高法院在2014年以司法解释的方式首次明确肯定了知假买假行为的合法性。这引起理论界和实务界新的关注。知假买假的逻辑基础在于知假买假者仍然属于消费者;知假买假的价值理念在于践行社会正义的价值理念。在消法领域,社会正义的价值理念是指,生活消费是实现人的全面自由发展的重要手段,生活消费成为衡量社会发展进步的重要指标,因此国家有义务和责任为社会大众创造公平、自由的消费环境,使社会大众通过生活消费享受到社会进步、经济发展带来的好处。知假买假的制度建构需要在保护消费者权益的法律制度体系中展开,需要明确知假买假规则与瑕疵担保责任(免除)规则之间的关系。
[Abstract]:The Supreme Court, for the first time, clearly affirmed the legitimacy of false purchase of fake behavior in the way of judicial interpretation in 2014. This has aroused new concern in the theoretical and practical circles. The logical basis of the fake buying is that the false buyer still belongs to the consumer; the value concept of knowing the fake buying and sham lies in the value concept of the practice of social justice. The value concept of justice is that the living consumption is an important means to realize the all-round and free development of the people. The living consumption is an important indicator of the progress of social development. Therefore, the state has the obligation and responsibility to create a fair and free consumption environment for the public, and make the public enjoy social progress and economic development through life consumption. The institutional construction of false buying and counterfeit needs to be carried out in the legal system of protecting the rights and interests of consumers, and the relationship between the rules of false buying and false buying and the rules of the liability for defects is clear.
【作者单位】：吉林大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究课题“纵向限制价格垄断协议的理论阐释与制度完善研究”(14SFB50036) 吉林大学基本科研费项目“标准必要专利垄断的法律规制问题研究”(2015ZZ031) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“垄断协议违法性分析模式问题研究”(13YJC820044)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】