人格物合同违约的精神损害赔偿研究
本文选题:精神损害赔偿 + 人格物 ; 参考:《首都经济贸易大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:目前,人们对于精神利益的保护愈加重视,不仅注重保护物质利益,对于人格利益的保护同样引人重视。“从现有的文献资料来看,对人格利益没有标准的定义”①人格利益体现在很多方面,其中人格物就是人格利益的一类重要载体,人格物不仅是人格利益的承载,也是人格利益的重要体现。人格利益的存在使得人格物较之一般物品有其特殊性。随着经济的发展,贸易往来出现愈加繁荣的趋势,合同的种类和内容日渐丰富。因人格物合同违约而产生的法律纠纷日益增多。就目前的现状而言,法律主要保护财产关系,财产关系作为当代社会的十分重要的社会关系毋庸置疑。但是人格利益的保护同样很重要,目前的法律制度还不够完善。不完善之处主要体现在:目前我国法律并没有对人格物合同违约的精神损害赔偿问题作出规定,因此,对于人格物合同违约的精神损害问题进行研究是很有必要的。本文重点从人格物合同违约所产生的精神损害赔偿的角度来进行研究,在明确人格物合同违约责任的构成要件的基础上,发现问题并通过建议的提出,使人格物合同中的利益受损方得到相应的精神损害赔偿,从而使原本可能不具备较高的市场价值但是对于特定的人来说具有极其重要的情感利益的物受到法律的特殊保护,这也更能体现出民法的人文关怀精神以及民法所倡导的公序良俗的基本原则。本文共分成六章内容:第一章主要是引言部分,主要包括研究背景与意义、国内外研究现状综述、论文的研究内容和研究方法以及论文的创新之处。第二章主要对人格物的基本理论进行概述。该章主要从实际案例入手,引入人格物的概念,继而阐述人格物的范围以及人格物的分类,在明确二者的基础上再对人格物的特征进行总结阐述,以此作为对人格物基本理论的解读。在对人格物的基本理论进行阐述后,第三章主要是对于人格物合同的相关基本理论进行阐述。主要包括人格物合同的概念和人格物合同的分类,在此基础上,介绍人格物合同违约的构成要件以及人格物合同违约的归责原则。通过前两章将人格物及人格物合同的基本理论阐释清楚以后,第四章主要是对国内外关于人格物以及人格物合同违约精神损害赔偿问题的研究状况进行梳理。第五章在探究国内外关于人格物合同违约精神损害赔偿问题研究现状的基础上对我国确立人格物合同违约精神损害赔偿制度的依据进行考量。第六章主要是对于目前我国人格物合同精神损害赔偿方面存在的问题进行分析,并针对存在的问题,有针对性地提出自己的构想与建议,该章内容主要包括:建立人格物清单制度以解决对人格物界定不明确的问题;进一步明确赔偿数额的确定依据以解决赔偿数额畸高的问题;建立案例指导制度以强化对法律实践的指导作用;提倡在合同文本中增加违约精神损害赔偿条款以倡导意思自治。
[Abstract]:At present, people pay more attention to the protection of spiritual interests, not only pay attention to the protection of material interests, but also pay attention to the protection of personality interests. "From the existing literature, there is no standard definition of personality interests". (1) personality interests are embodied in many aspects, and the human property is a kind of important carrier of personality interests. The grid is not only the bearing of the personality interests, but also the important embodiment of the personality interests. The existence of the personality interests makes the personalities more special than the general goods. With the development of the economy, the trade contacts are becoming more and more prosperous, the types and contents of the contract are increasingly rich. The legal disputes arising from the contract breach of the personality contract are increasing day by day. As far as the current situation is concerned, the law mainly protects the property relationship, and the property relationship is undoubtedly a very important social relationship in the contemporary society. But the protection of the personality interests is also very important, and the present legal system is not perfect. Therefore, it is necessary to study the mental damage of the breach of the contract of personality. This paper focuses on the study of the mental damage compensation from the contract breach of the human property contract, and finds out the problems and passes on the basis of the constitutive requirements of the liability for breach of contract in the contract of personality. The proposal is put forward to make the compensation for the damage to the interests of the interests in the contract of the human property, so that it may not have a higher market value, but the very important emotional interest for a particular person is protected by the law, which can also reflect the humanistic care and civil law of the civil law. The basic principles of public order and good customs advocated. This article is divided into six chapters: the first chapter is mainly the introduction part, mainly including the research background and significance, the domestic and foreign research status summary, the research content and the research method and the innovation of the paper. The second chapter mainly summarizes the basic theory of the human objects. In the case of the case, the concept of the human objects is introduced, then the scope of the human objects and the classification of the personality are expounded. On the basis of the clear two, the characteristics of the human objects are summarized and expounded as the basic theory of the personality. The third chapter is mainly about the personality contract after the basic theory of the human objects is expounded. It mainly includes the concept of the contract of personality and the classification of the contract of human property, on the basis of which, the constitutive requirements of the contract for breach of contract and the principle of imputation of the contract of breach of personality are introduced. After the first two chapters make a clear explanation of the basic theory of the contract of human objects and human objects, the fourth chapter is mainly about the At home and abroad, the research on the mental damage compensation for contract breach of contract of personality and personality is combed. The fifth chapter examines the basis for the establishment of the compensation system for the spiritual damage of the contract for breach of contract in our country on the basis of the study of the status quo of the research on the compensation for mental damage of the contract for breach of contract at home and abroad. If we analyze the existing problems in the compensation for the mental damage of the contract of the Chinese people, and put forward their own ideas and suggestions aiming at the existing problems, the contents of this chapter mainly include the establishment of the system of personality inventory to solve the problem of unidentified definition of personality, and further clarify the determination of the amount of compensation. In order to solve the problem of the high amount of compensation, the case guidance system should be established to strengthen the guiding role of the legal practice, and to promote the compensation for the spiritual damage of breach of contract in the text of the contract to advocate the autonomy of the meaning.
【学位授予单位】:首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙建丽;;论人格物的民法保护[J];华中师范大学研究生学报;2015年04期
2 刘轩妤;;论人格物在民法中的限缩与延伸[J];湖北警官学院学报;2015年05期
3 倪桂芳;;宠物之人格物化及其所涉精神损害赔偿问题研究[J];西南政法大学学报;2014年01期
4 冷传莉;;论人格物与一般人格权的内在契合[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2013年04期
5 尚继征;;论人格物的精神损害赔偿[J];法制与社会;2013年16期
6 田韶华;;侵权责任法上的物之损害赔偿问题[J];法学;2013年02期
7 章瑜婧;;论人格物的侵权责任[J];佳木斯大学社会科学学报;2012年06期
8 崔建远;;精神损害赔偿绝非侵权法所独有[J];法学杂志;2012年08期
9 袁丽红;;论精神损害赔偿——兼评《侵权责任法》第22条[J];新余学院学报;2011年04期
10 易继明;;财产权的三维价值——论财产之于人生的幸福[J];法学研究;2011年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 吴昊;虚拟人格物继承研究[D];南京大学;2016年
2 王炎;论人格物的精神损害赔偿责任[D];吉林大学;2016年
3 孙国蕊;人格物的侵权责任问题研究[D];烟台大学;2016年
4 黄潇;人格物的法律保护研究[D];浙江师范大学;2013年
5 彭赵龙;违约中的精神损害赔偿[D];西南政法大学;2011年
6 刘彭城;论侵害特定财产权之精神损害赔偿[D];西南政法大学;2011年
7 邹斌;我国精神损害赔偿制度研究[D];安徽大学;2010年
8 张晓明;具有人格利益的财产及损害赔偿问题的研究[D];贵州大学;2009年
9 曾颖;论与家庭有关的人格物[D];贵州大学;2008年
,本文编号:1980966
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1980966.html