我国民法实务中的以物抵债研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 09:50

本文选题：以物抵债 + 让与担保　；参考：《山东大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：由于以物抵债是存在于民法实务中的现象,不是严格意义上的法律概念,在考察实务中存在的以物抵债现象的基础上,从契约角度对以物抵债的概念进行界定。以物抵债是当事人达成的以交付特定物替代原定给付义务的合意。实务中以物抵债按照其功能进行区分,分别属于债的担保制度与债的消灭制度两种不同的法律制度。担保型以物抵债指在债务履行期届满前预先约定以物抵债,其功能在于担保债权的实现。清偿型以物抵债指在债务履行期届满后达成以物抵债合意,其功能在于以他种给付方式消灭原本的债权债务关系。不同种类的以物抵债应当在其所属的不同制度框架内予以规制。对两种不同以物抵债在理论上与既有的让与担保、后让与担保、代物清偿等制度进行匹配,为以物抵债现象的法律规制提供理论依据。进而通过对最高院案例、司法解释、会议纪要等分析,发现司法实践中对以物抵债案件处理中存在的问题。最后提出法律规制的建议。
[Abstract]:As rem is a phenomenon existing in the practice of civil law, it is not a legal concept in a strict sense. On the basis of investigating the phenomenon of recompense in practice, the concept of rem is defined from the angle of contract. Recompense is the agreement reached by the parties to replace the original payment obligation with the delivery of specific things. In practice, the debt is paid by goods according to its function, which belongs to two different legal systems: the guarantee system of debt and the system of debt elimination. Secured debt in rem refers to the prior agreement on recompense prior to the expiration of the period of performance of the debt, the function of which lies in the realization of the secured creditor's rights. Liquidating debt in return for goods refers to the agreement reached after the expiry of the period of debt performance, and its function is to destroy the original creditor's rights and liabilities by the other way of payment. Different kinds of redeemable debts should be regulated within the different institutional framework to which they belong. In order to provide the theoretical basis for the legal regulation of the phenomenon of retribution for debt, the two different systems are matched with the existing transfer guarantee, post-transfer guarantee and settlement of goods in theory. Through the analysis of the cases of Supreme Court, judicial interpretation, minutes of meetings and so on, the problems existing in dealing with the cases of retribution for debts in judicial practice are found. Finally, the suggestion of legal regulation is put forward.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】