论亲属间侵权行为的法律责任构建
发布时间:2018-06-05 12:01
本文选题:亲属 + 侵权行为 ; 参考:《云南大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:亲属间的侵权行为客观上一直都存在,只是在深受传统道德理念影响的中国,这一问题并没有得到足够的重视。 随着社会的进步,法治的思想开始深入人心。人们的权利意识也开始逐步提升和苏醒。现实生活中有层出不穷的亲属间的侵权行为,其处理原则和法律适用并没有体现出特殊性,与普通人之间的侵权行为的规则方法没有区别,笔者认为如此没有针对性的矛盾化解方式对此类纠纷的处理效果并不明显,没有起到正面督促和指引亲属间侵权纠纷的解决。本文试图对亲属间的侵权问题作出剖析和探讨,提出建设性的方案和意见。 本文分为六个章节,第一章节是引言,提出问题,第二章是亲属间侵权责任的基础,第三章是亲属间侵权责任的历史沿革和亲属范围的法律框定,第四章是亲属间侵权责任的构成要件及表现形式,第五章是构建亲属间侵权责任体系的思考,最后一个部分为结语,对本文的思路进行概括总结。
[Abstract]:The torts between relatives exist objectively, but in China, which is deeply influenced by traditional moral ideas, this problem has not been paid enough attention to. With the progress of society, the thought of rule of law began to take root in people's hearts. People's consciousness of right also began to rise step by step and awaken. In real life, there are endless torts among relatives. The principles of handling and the application of laws do not reflect the particularity, and there is no difference between the rules and methods of torts between ordinary people. The author thinks that the effect of resolving such disputes without pertinence is not obvious, and it does not play a positive role in urging and guiding the settlement of tort disputes among relatives. This paper attempts to analyze and discuss the infringement between relatives, and puts forward constructive plans and suggestions. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is the introduction, the second chapter is the foundation of the tort liability between relatives, the third chapter is the historical evolution of the tort liability between relatives and the legal framework of the scope of relatives. The fourth chapter is the constituent elements and the manifestation form of the tort liability between relatives, the fifth chapter is the thinking of constructing the tort liability system among relatives, the last part is the conclusion, and summarizes the ideas of this paper.
【学位授予单位】:云南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李洪祥;;我国夫妻财产制度的缺陷分析[J];长白学刊;2008年06期
2 钱腾飞;;不作为侵权行为探析[J];重庆科技学院学报(社会科学版);2010年09期
3 李洪祥;;离婚财产分割协议的类型、性质及效力[J];当代法学;2010年04期
4 李洪祥;王春莹;;婚姻法律存在的问题及对策研究——以亲属法体系的完善为视角[J];当代法学;2012年02期
5 李洪祥;;我国亲属法应当回归未来民法典[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2011年02期
6 李刚;;论中国古代亲属法的立法历程与特点[J];求索;2010年07期
7 夏吟兰;何俊萍;;现代大陆法系亲属法之发展变革[J];法学论坛;2011年02期
8 巫若枝;;三十年来中国婚姻法“回归民法”的反思——兼论保持与发展婚姻法独立部门法传统[J];法制与社会发展;2009年04期
9 李洪祥;李秀华;;中国内地与香港互相认可离婚判决的困境与解决模式选择[J];法制与社会发展;2010年06期
10 梁亚;李延生;;美国侵权法中父母侵权豁免制度变迁之探讨——兼对我国相关规则设计的思考[J];山东警察学院学报;2007年02期
,本文编号:1981919
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/1981919.html