再论冒名处分不动产的私法适用——类推适用的视角

发布时间：2018-06-08 12:28

本文选题：冒名处分不动产 + 类推适用　；参考：《现代法学》2017年03期

【摘要】：冒名处分不动产在无被冒名者追认而又有善意第三人保护之必要时,是一项法律漏洞,应以类推适用之方式进行填补。类推适用应在规范目的和类推目标下比较待决案件和拟类推规范下案型的构成要件,且需遵循现行法之体系。比较冒名处分不动产的类推目标与表见代理和善意取得的规范目的,以及可信赖事实,第三人善意和可归责性等要件,在我国现行法下,冒名处分不动产与不动产善意取得更为相似。在具体的类推适用上,一般伪造身份情形下应类推适用《物权法》第107条的特别善意取得;仅在利用相貌的特别冒名下才可类推适用《物权法》第106条的一般善意取得。
[Abstract]:The disposal of immovable property by impersonation is a legal loophole when it is not recognized by the impostor and has the protection of the third party in good faith, and it should be filled by analogy. The application of analogies should compare the constitutive elements of pending cases and quasi-analogies under the objective of norm and analogy, and should follow the system of current law. Under the present law of our country, the analogy target of impersonating disposition of immovable property, the normative purpose of apparent agency and bona fide acquisition, the reliable fact, the bona fide and imputable liability of the third party, etc., are compared under the present law of our country. False disposal of immovable property is more similar to bona fide acquisition of immovable property. In the specific application of analogy, the special bona fide acquisition of Article 107 of Real right Law should be applied by analogy in the case of general forgery of identity, and the general bona fide acquisition of Article 106 of Real Law can only be applied by analogy if special impersonation of appearance is used.
【作者单位】：中南财经政法大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】