论思想表达两分法的法律地位

发布时间：2018-06-09 20:09

本文选题：思想表达两分法 + 事实问题　；参考：《知识产权》2017年09期

【摘要】：思想表达两分法是法律问题,思想与表达的界分是事实问题;前者蕴含价值判断,后者与价值无涉;前者是法官在裁判时加以裁量,后者由当事人举证证明。法官在裁判过程中应区分法律问题与事实问题,避免将法律问题中的价值判断带进事实问题的证明中。虽然存在思想与表达难以界分的情况,但思想与表达的界分确实客观存在。著作权法应坚守思想表达两分法,并在著作权法司法实践中不断丰富和发展思想与表达的界分方法,以期实现著作权法的立法目的。
[Abstract]:The thought expression of two points is a legal problem, the boundary of thought and expression is a fact problem; the former contains value judgment, the latter is not related to the value; the former is the judge when it is judged in the referee, the latter is proved by the litigant. The judge should distinguish between the legal and the facts in the process of refereeing, and avoid the value judgment in the legal question. In the proof of the problem of entering the fact, although there is a situation that the thought and expression are difficult to divide, the boundary of thought and expression exists objectively. The copyright law should stick to the thought expression of the dual law, and enrich and develop the dividing method of thought and expression in the judicial practice of copyright law, in order to realize the legislative purpose of the copyright law.
【作者单位】：对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【基金】：对外经济贸易大学中国企业“走出去”协同创新中心科研项目(项目批准号:201501YY001A)研究成果
【分类号】：D913

【相似文献】