善意取得制度中“善意”认定问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-10 18:49

本文选题：善意取得 + 重大过失　；参考：《江西财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：最高人民法院正式公布《关于适用中华人民共和国物权法若干问题的解释(一)》,对善意取得制度进行了细化、具体化,对今后法院正确适用善意取得制度,维护交易安全具有重要的意义。但无论是原来的法律还是新的解释都未对善意取得制度中的“善意”作出详细的定义。“善意”在司法实务中常常因其难以界定而引发争议,“善意”判断的模糊性容易导致司法实践中法律适用的不一致。通过对实例的考察发现,该司法解释的规定仍存在着缺陷,值得进一步的研究。文章旨在通过对我国的善意取得制度进行实例研究,并结合理论与其他国家的立法,探寻一个更加符合善意取得制度立法精神、可供衡量的客观标准,以减轻司法的负担,维护交易安全和经济秩序。从司法实践上来看,善意取得案例虽不多,但在合同以及相关的侵权案件中,都会与善意取得具有一定的关联。善意认定是否成立,会影响案件的最终的判决结果。本文通过对我国的司法案例进行研究,考证我国实务上关于善意取得的案件中关于认定买受人善意与否的依据,并从我国对于善意取得制度中的“善意”进行立法以及实例研究。本文将从以下四部分探究这一制度的善意认定:第一部分是根据理论以及司法实践中对善意取得制度中的“善意”进行界定与分析,探讨“善意”的法理基础与价值体现,并从“主观善意”和“客观善意”两个方面探究我国法律框架下的善意认定的标准是否明晰和易于适用。第二部分是结合新的物权法解释对善意取得司法实践中出现的三个“善意”主要认定要件(重大过失、合理价格和举证责任分配)进行实例考察,找出一些存在司法实践中存在的问题。第三部分是对善意认定进行立法例比较,从外国的优秀法律理论中得到启示。文章的最后一部分根据善意认定要件在司法实践中出现的问题,结合国内外的立法以及理论,给出我国善意取得制度善意认定的一些完善建议。
[Abstract]:The Supreme people's Court officially promulgated the interpretation of several issues concerning the application of the property Law of the people's Republic of China (1), which refined and concretized the system of bona fide acquisition, and correctly applied the system of bona fide acquisition to the future courts. It is of great significance to maintain the security of transactions. However, neither the original law nor the new interpretation provides a detailed definition of bona fide in bona fide acquisition. In judicial practice, "good faith" often leads to controversy because of its difficulty in defining it. The ambiguity of "good faith" judgment can easily lead to the inconsistency of the application of law in judicial practice. Through the investigation of examples, it is found that the provisions of the judicial interpretation still have defects, which is worthy of further study. The purpose of this paper is to study the system of bona fide acquisition in China, and combine the theory with the legislation of other countries to find out an objective standard which can be measured in order to lighten the burden of the administration of justice, which is more in line with the spirit of legislation of the system of acquisition in good faith. Maintain transaction security and economic order. In judicial practice, there are few cases of bona fide acquisition, but in the contract and related tort cases, there is a certain relationship between bona fide acquisition. Whether or not the bona fide determination is established will affect the final judgment result of the case. Through the study of judicial cases in our country, this paper studies the basis of determining whether the buyer is bona fide or not in the case of bona fide acquisition in practice in our country. And from our country to the bona fide acquisition system in the "good faith" legislation and an example study. This article will explore this system from the following four parts: the first part is based on the theory and judicial practice of bona fide acquisition system in the definition and analysis, to explore the "bona fide" legal basis and value embodiment. From the two aspects of "subjective goodwill" and "objective goodwill", this paper probes into whether the standards of goodwill determination under the legal framework of our country are clear and easy to apply. The second part is a case study of three main elements of "good faith" (gross negligence, reasonable price and distribution of burden of proof) which appear in the judicial practice of bona fide acquisition in combination with the new interpretation of property law. Find out some problems existing in judicial practice. The third part compares the legislation cases of bona fide cognizance and draws inspiration from foreign excellent legal theory. In the last part of the article, according to the problems in judicial practice, combined with the domestic and foreign legislation and theory, the author gives some perfect suggestions on the bona fide recognition of bona fide acquisition system in our country.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】