商标淡化的司法判定
发布时间:2018-06-11 11:41
本文选题:淡化行为 + 反淡化 ; 参考:《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文首先从商标淡化的基本理论出发,通过列举美国、德国和国际公约对驰名商标淡化的立法规定,理清其判定标准;分析我国的立法现状和司法现状,梳理出我国司法实践过程中认定淡化的标准。最后,总结出应该如何对现有认定标准加以完善。本文分四章,其第一章是基本理论。通过对淡化定义、行为性质的阐释分析,详细地介绍了商标淡化的基本内涵。其次结合案例,论述了淡化的两种表现形式和例外情形。最后,论述了淡化和混淆的关系。第二章是对域外法的比较研究。通过对美国、德国、国际公约在商标淡化认定方面的研究比较,较为详细地分析了上述各国立法及国际公约的立法原因和立法效果,从中总结出其制度优劣的结论性观点,以及对我国的某些启示。第三章是对我国的立法现状和司法现状两方面进行梳理。立法上,基于对我国商标法和司法解释的研究、分析,论证了我国法律条文的规定是符合淡化理论的内涵;司法实践方面,通过对判决书的总结,理出我国商标淡化的三种处理方式,并以案例进行论证分析。第四章在前文的基础上,通过对域外法和我国司法实践中做法的分析,总结出我国商标淡化的司法判定标准及其不足之处。最后,以明确界定基本理论为基础,对商标淡化的司法判定提出完善建议。
[Abstract]:Starting from the basic theory of trademark desalination, this paper clarifies the judging standards of well-known trademark desalination by enumerating the legislative provisions of the United States, Germany and international conventions, and analyzes the current legislative and judicial situation of our country. Combing out the standards of desalination in the course of judicial practice in our country. Finally, it summarizes how to perfect the existing standards. This paper is divided into four chapters, the first chapter is the basic theory. The basic connotation of trademark desalination is introduced in detail by analyzing the definition of dilution and the nature of behavior. Secondly, it discusses the two forms and exceptions of desalination. Finally, the relationship between dilution and confusion is discussed. The second chapter is the comparative study of the extraterritorial laws. Through the comparison of the research on the trademark desalination of the United States, Germany and international conventions, this paper analyzes in detail the legislative reasons and the legislative effects of the above countries' legislation and international conventions, and concludes the conclusion of the advantages and disadvantages of the system. And some enlightenment to our country. The third chapter is to comb the legislative and judicial status quo in China. In legislation, based on the study of trademark law and judicial interpretation of our country, it is proved that the provisions of Chinese legal provisions are in accordance with the connotation of desalination theory. In this paper, three ways of dealing with trademark dilution in China are discussed and analyzed by case study. The fourth chapter, on the basis of the above, through the analysis of the extraterritorial law and the judicial practice of our country, summarizes the judicial judgment standard and its deficiency of trademark desalination in our country. Finally, on the basis of defining the basic theory clearly, the author puts forward some suggestions on the judicial judgment of trademark dilution.
【学位授予单位】:宁波大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.43
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 康添雄;;专利侵权不停止的司法可能及其实现[J];知识产权;2012年02期
2 祝建军;;反向混淆侵权的认定[J];人民司法;2011年24期
3 陈波;;“本色化”与中国想象[J];读书;2011年12期
4 张玉敏;;论使用在商标制度构建中的作用——写在商标法第三次修改之际[J];知识产权;2011年09期
5 李雨峰;;重塑侵害商标权的认定标准[J];现代法学;2010年06期
6 康添雄;;驰名商标诉讼证据和纠纷解决的理论出路[J];特区经济;2010年03期
7 邓宏光;;我国驰名商标反淡化制度应当缓行[J];法学;2010年02期
8 李友根;;“淡化理论”在商标案件裁判中的影响分析——对100份驰名商标案件判决书的整理与研究[J];法商研究;2008年03期
9 夏君丽;;关于驰名商标司法保护价值取向及制度设置的思考[J];法律适用;2007年12期
10 李明德;;中日驰名商标保护比较研究[J];环球法律评论;2007年05期
,本文编号:2005076
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2005076.html