真正第三人利益合同关系的相对性及类型化

发布时间：2018-06-12 14:47

本文选题：真正第三人利益合同 + 合同关系　；参考：《商业研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：本文基于立法论立场讨论真正第三人利益合同与相对性的冲突与协调,在分析两种基础法律关系的基础上归纳出真正第三人利益合同的类型。相对性原则是真正第三人利益合同在立法上确立的最大理论障碍,真正第三人利益合同是对相对性的有限突破。其对外效力与物权对外效力的区别非常明显,未及于权利人以外的所有人,限于约定的纯获利益的特定第三人。另外,由于"补偿关系"和"对价关系"概念本身存在的局限性,应将以上两概念分别修正为"合同关系"和"原因关系"。真正第三人利益合同关系的类型取决于两种基础关系的类型,而不应仅仅取决于合同关系类型;其所形成的三方法律关系并非纯粹的合同关系,更非两个合同关系的简单相加,但仍属于债的关系范畴。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the conflict and coordination between the real third party's interest contract and the relativity based on the standpoint of legislation, and concludes the types of the real third party's interest contract on the basis of analyzing the two basic legal relations. The principle of relativity is the biggest theoretical obstacle to the legislative establishment of the real third party interest contract, and the real third party interest contract is a limited breakthrough to the relativity. The difference between the external effect and the external effect of real right is very obvious. In addition, due to the limitation of the concepts of "compensation relationship" and "consideration relationship", the above two concepts should be revised to "contract relationship" and "cause relationship" respectively. The type of the true third party's interest contract relationship depends on the type of the two basic relations, and should not only depend on the type of the contract relationship; the tripartite legal relationship formed by it is not a pure contractual relationship, much less the simple addition of the two contractual relations. But it still belongs to the relationship of debt.
【作者单位】：北京航空航天大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金资助项目“民法证据规范论:案件事实的形成与民法学方法论的完善”,项目编号:15FFX005
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】