技术特征等同认定标准的适用研究

发布时间：2018-06-18 05:13

本文选题：等同认定 + 客观标准　；参考：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：技术特征等同的认定标准是适用等同原则的核心问题之一。我国虽然通过最高人民法院发布的相关司法解释确立了该标准的适用方法,但由于缺少对核心概念以及具体判定要素的进一步界定,我国法官在处理专利侵权案件时,适用等同认定标准的分析路径并不一致,也就难以实现“同案同判”。因此,有必要对这一标准的适用问题展开进一步的研究,以助力专利审判实践,更好地解决相关利益纷争。本文的总体思路为:首先,以司法实务中的典型案例为出发点,分析案例中所反映的焦点问题,并从中引出对焦点问题的法律分析与同类型案例分析;然后,在上述分析的基础上,着眼于我国司法实务需要,对技术特征等同认定标准的适用提出具体建议。主要内容分为三部分:第一部分是案例概要以及焦点问题的引出。在对“‘折叠车架’发明专利侵权案”的案情以及法院的判决进行简要介绍之后,分析归纳出技术特征等同认定标准适用过程中的焦点问题:一是“手段—功能—效果”三要素测试标准(客观标准)具体如何适用;二是本领域普通技术人员的“显而易见”标准(主观标准)具体如何适用;三是两个标准的共同适用关系如何界定。第二部分是针对焦点问题的法律分析。本部分首先通过比较分析美德两国的技术特征等同认定标准,进而对我国该标准进行了评析,在理论上对我国该标准的适用提出了进一步客观化的建议。然后,结合相关概念的界定与同类型案例分析,对我国技术特征等同认定的客观标准与主观标准的适用问题进行了深入的分析与探讨,并得出结论:在确认“手段、功能、效果”三者基本相同之具体含义的前提下才能正确适用客观标准,其适用中又以手段的认定为重点;主观标准的适用关键在于“本领域普通技术人员”概念的具体化以及运用这一主体概念的界定,参照比新颖性略高但又比创造性水平低的标准进行认定;主客观标准的共同适用才能维护我国技术特征等同认定标准的整体性,从而作出合乎司法解释精神的判决。第三部分是从本案看技术特征等同认定标准在我国专利审判中的适用。该部分结合前文内容提出了具体建议:我国技术特征等同认定标准的适用应遵循客观标准的重点适用,推进主观标准的客观化,并坚持以“主客观标准的共同适用”为原则,在充分考虑司法实践需要的基础上,确立一些具体的判断要件。
[Abstract]:The standard of identification of technical characteristics is one of the core issues of the application of the principle of equivalence. China has established the applicable method of the standard through the relevant judicial interpretations issued by the Supreme People's court, but because of the lack of further definition of the core concepts and specific determinant elements, the judges of our country are applicable in dealing with patent infringement cases. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out further research on the application of this standard, so as to help the practice of patent trial and better solve the disputes of relevant interests. The general idea of this paper is: first, the analysis of typical cases in judicial practice is the starting point and analysis. The focus of the case is reflected in the case, and derivation of the legal analysis of the focus problem and the analysis of the same type of case from it. Then, on the basis of the above analysis, with a view to the needs of the judicial practice in our country, it puts forward specific suggestions on the application of the standard of identification of technical characteristics. The main internal capacity is divided into three parts: the first part is the case summary and the focal point. After a brief introduction to the case of "the infringement case of the invention patent of the folding frame" and the court's judgment, the focus of the application of the standard identification standard of technical characteristics is analyzed and summed up: one is the specific application of the three elements of the "means function effect" test standard (objective standard); two How to apply the "obvious" standard (subjective standard) of ordinary technical personnel in this field; three is how to define the common application of the two standards. The second part is the legal analysis of the focus problem. This part first compares and analyzes the technical characteristics of the two countries by comparing the standard of identification, and then the standard of our country is carried out. In theory, the application of the standard is further objectified in our country. Then, combined with the definition of the related concepts and the analysis of the same types of cases, this paper makes an in-depth analysis and Discussion on the application of the objective standard and the subjective standard of the identification of the technical characteristics of our country, and draws a conclusion that the "means, function," The objective criterion can be correctly applied to the three people with the same specific meaning, and the key of the application is the determination of means. The key to the application of the subjective standard lies in the concretion of the concept of "ordinary technical personnel in the field" and the definition of the application of the subject concept, which is slightly higher than the creative water and is more than the creative water. The standard of low level is recognized; the common application of subjective and objective standards can maintain the integrity of the standard of identification of technical characteristics in China, and thus make a judgment in accordance with the spirit of judicial interpretation. The third part is to see the application of the standard of identification of technical characteristics in the trial of patent in our country. Suggestion: the application of the standard of identification of technical characteristics in China should follow the emphasis of the objective standard, promote the objectification of the subjective standards, and adhere to the principle of "the common application of subjective and objective standards", and establish some specific elements of judgment on the basis of fully considering the needs of judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.4

【相似文献】