船东互保协会保函法律属性研究
本文选题:船东互保协会 + 保函 ; 参考:《大连海事大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:随着中国对外开放的不断深入,以及21世纪海上丝绸之路的加速发展,国际海运贸易在我国贸易中所占比重不断增加。这必然会涌现越来越多涉及船舶的海事纠纷。当海事纠纷的出现时,船东通常会因船舶被扣押或将被扣押,而请求船东互保协会提供保函以阻止船舶被扣押或使船舶能够尽快得到释放,以此来尽可能减少不必要的运营损失。我国船东大多是向中国船东互保协会申请保函。但在理论和司法实践中,我国对船东互保协会为解除船舶扣押或者滞留而出具的通常格式的保函法律性质的认定上存在很大的争议。本论文首先介绍了船东互保协会通常格式的保函法律性质认定中之观点分歧,在依据我国《中华人民共和国担保法》、独立保函的相关理论的基础上,对船东互保协会提供的通常格式的保函应当属于独立保函进行了论述,并针对我国司法实践中船东互保协会保函纠纷中存在的问题,以及船东互保协会保函被认定成为独立保函存在的障碍,提出相应的解决建议。本文共有四部分构成:第一部分是对船东互保协会保函的概述。这部分主要介绍船东互保协会保函的概念与特点、船东互保协会放船保函的形式与内容以及船东互保协会出具保函所需要的条件。第二部分是从国内外两方面分析了船东互保协会通常格式的保函法律性质认定上存在的各种观点。本部分首先介绍了《中华人民共和国担保法》下规定的保证观以及独立保函观,然后对主要的英美法系国家、大陆法系国家对船东互保协会通常格式的保函法律性质的认定进行介绍和分析。第三部分是对现有的保函法律性质观点分析,并提出笔者对船东互保协会保函法律性质认定观点。本部分首先对船东互保协会出具的通常格式的保函非《中华人民共和国担保法》下规定的保证进行论证;然后,对船东互保协会通常格式的保函属于独立保函进行论证。第四部分是对解决船东互保协会保函纠纷提出的相关建议。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of China's opening to the outside world and the accelerated development of the maritime Silk Road in the 21st century, the proportion of international maritime trade in China's trade is increasing. This is bound to emerge more and more maritime disputes involving ships. When a maritime dispute arises, the shipowner usually requests the shipowner's association to provide a guarantee to prevent the arrest of the ship or to enable the ship to be released as soon as possible by reason of the arrest or imminent arrest of the ship, In this way to minimize unnecessary operational losses. Most shipowners in China apply for guarantees from the China Shipowners' Mutual Insurance Association. However, in theory and judicial practice, there is a great dispute on the legal nature of the usual form of guarantee issued by the shipowners' mutual insurance association to relieve the arrest or detention of the ship. This paper first introduces the differences of views on the legal nature of the guarantee in the usual format of the shipowners' mutual insurance association, based on the relevant theories of the independent guarantee according to the guarantee Law of the people's Republic of China. This paper discusses that the usual form of guarantee provided by the shipowner's mutual protection association should be an independent guarantee, and aims at the problems existing in the dispute of guarantee provided by the shipowner's mutual protection association in our country's judicial practice. The guarantee of shipowner's mutual insurance association is recognized as the obstacle of independent guarantee, and the corresponding solution is put forward. This paper consists of four parts: the first part is an overview of the guarantee letter of shipowners' mutual insurance association. This part mainly introduces the concept and characteristics of the guarantee of the shipowners' mutual insurance association, the form and content of the ship release guarantee of the shipowners' mutual insurance association and the conditions required by the shipowners' mutual insurance association to issue the letter of guarantee. The second part is to analyze the legal nature of the usual form of the shipowners' mutual insurance association from domestic and foreign aspects of the existence of a variety of views. This part first introduces the concept of guarantee and independent guarantee under the guarantee Law of the people's Republic of China, and then introduces the main common law countries. This paper introduces and analyzes the legal nature of the letter of guarantee in the common form of the shipowner's mutual insurance association in the countries of civil law system. In the third part, the author analyzes the existing legal nature of guarantee, and puts forward the author's opinion on the legal nature of guarantee of shipowners' mutual insurance association. This part first demonstrates that the usual form of guarantee issued by the shipowner's mutual insurance association is not the guarantee stipulated under the guarantee Law of the people's Republic of China, and then demonstrates that the usual form of guarantee issued by the shipowner's mutual insurance association is an independent guarantee. The fourth part is to resolve the shipowner mutual protection association guarantee dispute put forward the related suggestion.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 王大荣,韩文浩,邓丽娟,汪鹏南;船东互保协会特别补偿条款(SCOPIC)——劳合社救助合同标准格式(LOF)修正案[J];中国海商法年刊;2000年00期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 杨斌;;成立船东互保协会 开创渔业互保事业——1994年9月农业部成立中国渔船船东互保协会[A];中国渔业改革开放三十年[C];2008年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 王守仁;美国船东互保协会面临财务窘境[N];国际商报;2006年
2 王守仁;美船东互保协会资金告急[N];中国船舶报;2006年
3 通讯员 杨颖;中国船东互保协会庆祝成立25周年[N];中国远洋报;2009年
4 记者 罗迅革 通讯员 徐守庭;省船东互保协会快速理赔[N];汕尾日报;2009年
5 稿件由邓松岭提供;2004年船东互保协会赔案概览[N];中国渔业报;2005年
6 梁燕玲;广东船东互保雪中送炭[N];中国渔业报;2006年
7 通讯员 仲远轩;魏家福连任新一届中国船东互保协会董事长[N];中国远洋报;2013年
8 邓松岭邋宗宏;互保福州代办处正式挂牌[N];中国渔业报;2007年
9 杨斌 田丽娟;中国渔船船东互保协会召开二届四次理事长会议[N];中国渔业报;2005年
10 邓松岭;中国渔船船东互保协会2004年上半年十大渔船互保理赔案件[N];中国渔业报;2004年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 谢腾飞;船东互保协会保函法律属性研究[D];大连海事大学;2017年
2 林春红;第三人对船东互保协会的直接诉讼制度研究[D];厦门大学;2006年
3 李繁;船东互保协会性质研究兼谈我国海商法对船东互保协会立法的改进[D];中国政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:2036642
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2036642.html