P2P软件和服务提供商著作权侵害刑事责任探究——以P2P技术架构为切入点

发布时间：2018-06-19 01:52

本文选题：PP技术 + 教唆　；参考：《政治与法律》2016年03期

【摘要】：P2P去中心化的技术架构决定通常直接侵害著作权的终端用户难以被追责,由此产生P2P软件和服务提供商是否应为终端用户行为负责的问题。域外典型案件表明,不同P2P技术架构下网络服务商在著作权侵害中所起的作用、对用户侵害著作权的知悉可能性以及对于用户的监督控制能力大相径庭,因而是采取集中或混合式架构还是分散式架构对于P2P网络商的责任评价可能产生不同影响,有必要针对其提供P2P软件和服务的行为,就教唆犯与帮助犯各自的成立条件基于不同的技术架构予以仔细分析。《刑法修正案(九)》试图通过共犯正犯化的规定彻底解决网络服务商刑事责任的有关问题,但因不考虑技术的特性而显得有些"冒进",需要予以反思。
[Abstract]:The decentralization of P2P technology decides that the end user who directly infringes the copyright is difficult to be held accountable, which leads to the question whether the P2P software and service provider should be responsible for the end user's behavior. Typical cases abroad show that the role played by network service providers in copyright infringement under different P2P technology frameworks, the possibility of users' knowledge of copyright infringement and their ability to supervise and control copyright infringement vary greatly. Since a centralized or hybrid architecture or a decentralized architecture may have different effects on the assessment of P2P network providers' responsibilities, it is necessary to address the behavior of providing P2P software and services. This paper makes a careful analysis of the establishment conditions of the abettor and the aider based on different technical frameworks. < Criminal Law Amendment (9) > attempts to solve the problems related to the criminal liability of the network service provider thoroughly through the regulation of accomplice. But because does not consider the technical characteristic and appears some "bold advance", needs to reflect.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学法学院;
【基金】：2012年教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“网络环境下我国著作权刑事保护研究”(项目编号:12YJA820087)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D923.41

【参考文献】