论《侵权责任法》第58条中的“诊疗规范”

发布时间：2018-06-22 23:14

本文选题：诊疗规范 + 过错推定　；参考：《中国卫生事业管理》2017年08期

【摘要】：当前对于"诊疗规范"的理解存在不够全面和不符合医学实践等问题。诊疗规范的范围应当包括医学教科书、医药学专著、专业期刊杂志,甚至外国或者国际组织制定的技术规范。在适用《侵权责任法》第58条的过错推定时,应当首先区分强制性与非强制性诊疗规范,然后进一步区分应当遵守的和可以参考的诊疗规范。违反强制性诊疗规范的法律后果是不可反证的过错推定,违反应当遵守的诊疗规范的后果是可以反证的过错推定,违反可以参考的诊疗规范不适用过错推定。
[Abstract]:The current understanding of "diagnostic and treatment norms" is not comprehensive enough and does not conform to medical practice and so on. The scope of diagnostic and treatment norms should include medical textbooks, medical monographs, specialized journals, and even technical specifications developed by foreign or international organizations. In applying the presumption of fault in Article 58 of the Tort liability Law, we should first distinguish between compulsory and non-compulsory diagnostic and treatment norms, and then further distinguish between those that should be observed and those that can be referred to. The legal consequence of violating the compulsory diagnosis and treatment norm is the presumption of fault which cannot be proved, the consequence of the violation of the standard of diagnosis and treatment that should be observed is the presumption of fault that can be proved, and the presumption of fault is not applicable to the violation of the norm of diagnosis and treatment which can be referred to.
【作者单位】：江苏大学法学院;
【基金】：江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究基金“医务人员的告知义务及其责任研究”(编号:2014SJB812)
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】