中国不动产物权变动立法模式反思及检讨

发布时间：2018-06-24 05:43

本文选题：不动产 + 登记要件主义　；参考：《江西财经大学学报》2015年04期

【摘要】：尽管《物权法》立法之初,就不动产物权变动制度应采何种立法模式,就有过激烈的争论,但最终中国采用了类似德国的登记要件主义的立法模式。大多立法专家一般认为,采用登记要件主义具有维护交易安全、明确产权关系、促进不动产的案件审理、加强对不动产行政管理和税收征管等方面的优势。但是此种立法模式在维护交易安全、明确产权关系、加强对不动产行政管理和税收征管等方面,并非如立法专家所言,具有非常明显的优势。反而是存在与老百姓的现实生活习惯相背离、容易导致违背当事人意思自治和违背民法诚实信用原则的情况,同时也在司法实践中引发了不少的法律困境。而立法如采用登记对抗主义立法模式,则易于克服上述弊端,得到普通百姓的认可、尊重和遵守,希望将来中国修改《物权法》能对此种立法模式给予足够的考虑和重视。
[Abstract]:Although there has been a heated debate about what kind of legislative model should be adopted in the system of real property right change at the beginning of the legislation of Real right Law, China finally adopted a legislative model similar to that of Germany's registration essentialism. Most legislative experts generally believe that the use of registration elements has the advantages of maintaining transaction security, clarifying property rights relationship, promoting the trial of real estate cases, and strengthening the administration of real estate and tax collection and management. However, this kind of legislative model does not have obvious advantages in maintaining transaction security, clarifying property rights relationship, strengthening administration of real estate and tax collection and management, etc. On the contrary, there is a deviation from the real life habits of the common people, which easily leads to the violation of the party's autonomy and the principle of good faith in civil law. At the same time, it also leads to a lot of legal difficulties in the judicial practice. If the legislation adopts the legislation mode of registration antagonism, it will be easy to overcome the above disadvantages and be recognized, respected and obeyed by the ordinary people. It is hoped that the revision of the property Law in China in the future can give sufficient consideration and attention to this legislative model.
【作者单位】：中央财经大学法学院;
【分类号】：D923.2

【参考文献】