居间合同中“跳单”条款的效力研究

发布时间：2018-06-29 22:12

本文选题：居间合同 + 独家委托协议　；参考：《宁波大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：目前我国的房地产市场呈现一种繁荣发展的趋势,而房地产市场中的一项重要内容就是房产中介机构,从某种程度上讲,房产中介行业促进了房地产市场的发展。然而目前在房地产交易市场中,“跳单”纠纷不断产生,对房产中介市场的发展产生了影响。市场上的“跳单”纠纷情形纷繁复杂,司法审判不统一,虽然最高院发布了关于“跳单”案件的,但并不能完全解决“跳单”纠纷。所以本文将对“跳单”条款的效力进行全面把握,以期能够为实践中解决“跳单”纠纷提供思路。第一部分,通过介绍和分析最高院指导案例,引出问题,开启全篇对于禁止“跳单”条款效力的判断。第二部分,对居间合同中的“跳单”行为进行法律界定。首先概括出“跳单”的定义和认定标准,然后准确把握分析其产生的原因,列举其特征和表现形式,即“另则居间人”和“跳过居间人”两种主要表现形式。在全面了解“跳单”行为本身之后,对禁止“跳单”条款进行研究,分析了禁止“跳单”条款的概念和法律属性,作为第三部分对禁止“跳单”条款的法律效力进行重新审视的基础。第三部分,对禁止“跳单”条款的法律效力进行深入的探讨。从主观上是否双方达成合意、委托人是否存在“恶意跳单”行为,客观上双方是否达成了独家委托协议以及禁止“跳单”条款是否排除了合同一方的主要责任四个方面对禁止“跳单”条款的法律效力进行全面的审视。第四部分,通过对实践中案例的总结和上文的分析,确定违约“跳单”行为的法律后果承担范围,并且从逐一分析居间人的各种请求权在委托人发生“跳单”行为后如何行使,从而明确“跳单”行为的法律后果。
[Abstract]:At present, the real estate market in China has a trend of prosperity and development, and an important content of the real estate market is real estate agency. To some extent, the real estate intermediary industry has promoted the development of the real estate market. However, in the real estate market, the "jump single" dispute is constantly emerging and the real estate intermediary market is in the market. The development of the "jump single" dispute in the market is complicated and the judicial trial is not unified. Although the Supreme Court has issued the "jump single" case, it can not completely solve the "jump single" dispute. So this article will make a comprehensive grasp of the effect of the "jump single" clause in order to solve the "jump list" in practice. The first part, through the introduction and analysis of the Supreme Court guidance case, leads to the question and opens the whole article to judge the effect of the prohibition of the "jump single" clause. In the second part, it defines the act of "jumping single" in the interposition contract. First, it summarizes the definition and determination standard of the "jump list", and then accurately grasps and analyzes its production. The causes of birth are listed in two main forms of expression, namely, "the other man" and "skipping the interperson". After a comprehensive understanding of the act itself, the article studies the prohibition of the "jump single" clause and analyzes the concept and legal attributes of the prohibition of the "jump single" clause as the third part of the prohibition of the "jump list". In the third part, the legal effect of the prohibition of the "jump list" is discussed in depth. Whether the two sides agree or not, whether the client has a "malicious jump", whether the two parties have reached an exclusive agreement and prohibit the list of "hops" or not. In addition to the main responsibility of the one party in the contract four aspects of the prohibition of the "jump single" provisions of the legal effect of a comprehensive examination. The fourth part, through the summary of the case in practice and the analysis of the above, determine the legal consequences of the breach of the "jump single" act of the legal consequences of the scope, and from one by one analysis of the various rights of the broker in the client. How to exercise "jump" behavior to clarify the legal consequences of "jumping alone" behavior.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】