论缔约过失责任中的纯经济损失

发布时间：2018-07-02 08:36

本文选题：纯经济损失 + 缔约过失责任　；参考：《华东政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：纯经济损失的概念最早产生于英美判例法之中,时至今日虽然只有少数国家在立法中明确提出对其进行保护,但从理论与司法实践的发展趋势来看,对纯经济损失的保护更符合经济发展、维护交易动态安全的需要。而缔约阶段发生的纯经济损失的救济不仅牵涉到对纯经济损失一般保护机制的构建,而且涉及到对缔约过失责任的责任性质及保护范围,本文通过对纯经济损失的相关学说进行分析比较,同时考察其他国家对纯经济损失的救济措施,对缔约过失责任中的纯经济损失救济进行了探讨,本文除引言外共分为五章。第一章,纯经济损失概述。本部分从纯经济损失概念出发,总结了纯经济损失的特征,并与相关概念特别是信赖利益作了对比,指出两者之间是一种部分包含的关系。同时也对纯经济损失的类型作了介绍,并将缔约阶段的纯经济损失划分为加害型纯经济损失与信赖型纯经济损失。第二章,缔约过失责任概述。从缔约过失责任的提出、概念、性质三个方面入手,对缔约过失责任作了简单的介绍。第三章,其他国家对缔约阶段纯经济损失的保护现状。这一部分介绍了德国、法国、英美对纯经济损失的保护,并探讨了缔约阶段的纯经济损失如何在这些国家得到救济。第四章,我国纯经济损失的救济。这一部分从立法层面介绍了我国当前立法对纯经济损失的保护,分析了缔约阶段的纯经济损失在目前立法中寻求救济的可能性。同时也介绍了理论界对这一问题的看法。第五章,我国对缔约阶段中纯经济损失救济的制度建构。这一部分分析了缔约过失责任的独立性、侵权法与契约法的保护范围、提供救济所导致的诉讼泛滥风险及纯经济损失的保护范围。虽然没有提出救济制度的具体设置方法,但通过对相关要素的分析提出了一些意见。
[Abstract]:The concept of pure economic loss originated from the case law of the United States and the United States. Today, although only a few countries have explicitly proposed to protect it in their legislation, it is seen from the development trend of theory and judicial practice. The protection of pure economic losses is more in line with the economic development, the need to maintain the dynamic security of transactions. The relief of pure economic loss in contracting stage involves not only the construction of general protection mechanism for pure economic loss, but also the nature and scope of liability for fault in contracting. This paper analyzes and compares the relevant theories of pure economic loss, at the same time investigates the relief measures of pure economic loss in other countries, and probes into the relief of pure economic loss in the liability for fault in contracting. This article is divided into five chapters except the introduction. The first chapter is the summary of pure economic loss. Based on the concept of pure economic loss, this part summarizes the characteristics of pure economic loss, and compares it with related concepts, especially trust interests, and points out that the relationship between them is partially contained. At the same time, the types of pure economic losses are introduced, and the pure economic losses in the contracting stage are divided into harmful pure economic losses and trust pure economic losses. Chapter two: summary of fault liability in contracting. This paper introduces the fault liability in contracting from three aspects: put forward, concept and nature. Chapter three, the current situation of protection of pure economic loss in other countries. This part introduces the protection of pure economic loss in Germany, France, Britain and the United States, and discusses how the pure economic loss in the contracting stage can be remedied in these countries. The fourth chapter, our country pure economic loss relief. This part introduces the protection of China's current legislation on pure economic loss from the legislative level, and analyzes the possibility of seeking relief for the pure economic loss in the stage of contracting. At the same time, it also introduces the views of the theorists on this issue. The fifth chapter, our country in the contracting stage pure economic loss relief system construction. This part analyzes the independence of fault liability in contracting, the scope of protection of tort law and contract law, the risk of litigation overflow caused by providing relief and the scope of protection of pure economic loss. Although there is no specific method of setting up relief system, some suggestions are put forward through the analysis of relevant elements.
【学位授予单位】：华东政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】