个人信息财产权理论及其检讨

发布时间：2018-07-02 22:55

本文选题：个人信息财产权 + 人格权　；参考：《学习与探索》2017年10期

【摘要】：在信息社会,个人信息的商业利用与信息隐私保护已经成为矛盾的两个方面。个人信息财产权因其突出"信息主体的能动性"与"实现经济收益"等优势受到国内外诸多学者拥护。然而,个人信息所蕴含的利益是多元的,既有人格尊严利益,又有自由利益、经济利益,仅从个人信息具有财富创造功能角度证成个人信息财产权是片面的。对个人信息财产权的检讨源自三个方面:人格权对个人信息财产权的批判集中在人格信息的"客体化",导致了人的尊严被贬损;财产权自身的特质如财产权劳动理论、排他性及可转让性等也不适用于个人信息;实践理性如"自我决策困境""集体行动难题"和为数众多的"例外使用"也使得个人信息财产权举步维艰。因此,个人信息保护立法应综合考量各种利益,使个人信息的监管体制与保护理念相统一。
[Abstract]:In the information society, the commercial utilization of personal information and the protection of information privacy have become two contradictory aspects. Personal information property right is supported by many scholars at home and abroad because of its advantages of "the initiative of information subject" and "realizing economic benefits". However, the interests contained in personal information are pluralistic, both human dignity interests, free interests and economic interests. It is one-sided to prove personal information property rights only from the point of view of the wealth creation function of personal information. The review of the property right of personal information originates from three aspects: the critique of personality right to personal information property right focuses on the objectification of personality information, which leads to the derogation of human dignity, and the property right itself is characterized by the theory of property right labor. Exclusivity and transferability are not applicable to personal information, and practical rationality such as "self-decision dilemma" collective action problem "and numerous" exceptional use "also make personal information property rights difficult. Therefore, the legislation of personal information protection should consider all kinds of interests synthetically and unify the supervision system of personal information with the idea of protection.
【作者单位】：河南科技大学法学院;
【基金】：河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“大数据背景下的个人信息安全与隐私保护研究”(2017BFX014)
【分类号】：D923

【相似文献】