工伤保险补偿与侵权赔偿竞合下适用模式研究

发布时间：2018-07-03 19:48

  本文选题：工伤保险补偿 + 侵权赔偿　； 参考：《东南大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：当工伤事故发生后,职工的人身权利和劳动能力受到侵害时,如何快速全面地救济、保障职工的权益是立法者和实践者着重考虑的问题。然而认识上的差异,导致在立法理论和审判实践中对工伤事故的救济存在不同的处理方式,由此便产生了救济模式的不同。’即职工发生工伤,可主张工伤保险待遇给付,或请求侵权损害赔偿,也可同时主张工伤保险待遇给付和侵权损害赔偿。但在目前侵权引发工伤保险与民事侵权的法律竞合问题,因所依据的法律基础和救济途径不同。认为,两种请求权的权利基础和归责原则不同,工伤赔偿请求权基础是劳动者因发生工伤事故获得的一种社会保险利益,工伤保险损害赔偿实行无过错责任原则,有社会保险性质；而第三人侵权损害赔偿请求权基础是劳动者因第三人侵权致害而取得,侵权损害赔偿实行的是民法的填平原则、过错原则和过失相抵原则,侵权损害赔偿的损失包括财产性损失及非财产性损失,其性质属于私法领域的赔偿2。在理论上争论不休,立法中又未对这一问题做出明确规定,司法实践中更是各行其是。为妥善处理目前工伤保险补偿与侵权损害赔偿竞合案件,很有必要梳理目前存在矛盾或不合时宜的法律法规,整合适用模式,理顺处理机制,最终达到在处理工伤保险补偿与侵权损害赔偿竞合案件时有法可依、有章可循,使得处理该类案件快捷高效,减轻诉累,尽可能保障当事人的权益；同时应当兼顾公平、责任原则。3本文以三个现实生活中发生的案例为切入口,分析我国工伤保险和侵权损害赔偿竟合处理的立法现状,比较竞合的各种适用模式,探讨工伤事故的侵权责任主体、过错责任及目前特殊用工形式、特殊群体的不同而选择不同适用模式,为目前司法实践中处理该类案件提供一定的参考。
[Abstract]:When the workers' personal rights and labor ability are infringed upon after the accident, how to relieve the workers quickly and comprehensively, and how to protect the workers' rights and interests is a problem that legislators and practitioners pay more attention to. However, the difference in cognition leads to different ways of dealing with the relief of industrial accidents in the legislative theory and the trial practice, which leads to different relief modes. Namely worker inductrial injury, can advocate inductrial injury insurance treatment pay, or request tort damage compensation, also can advocate inductrial injury insurance treatment pay and tort damage compensation. However, at present, the problem of legal concurrence between industrial injury insurance and civil tort is caused by tort, because of the different legal basis and remedies. The author holds that the right basis and imputation principle of the two claims are different. The basis of claim for industrial injury compensation is a kind of social insurance benefit obtained by the laborer as a result of the industrial injury accident, and the principle of no-fault liability is applied in the compensation for injury insurance damage. The third party has the nature of social insurance, and the right of claim for tort damages of the third party is based on the principle of filling in the civil law, the principle of fault and the principle of fault offset, which is obtained by the third party because of the damage caused by the infringement of the third party. The loss of tort damages includes property loss and non-property loss, and its nature belongs to the compensation in the field of private law. There is no clear stipulation on this issue in the legislation, especially in judicial practice. In order to properly deal with the current cases of compensation for industrial injury insurance and compensation for infringement damages, it is necessary to sort out the existing contradictions or outdated laws and regulations, integrate applicable models, and rationalize the handling mechanism. Finally, there are laws to be followed and rules to be followed when dealing with the cases of compensation for industrial injury insurance and compensation for infringement damages, so that the handling of such cases is fast and efficient, reducing the burden of litigation, and protecting the rights and interests of the parties as much as possible; at the same time, it should take into account the fairness of the cases. Taking three real life cases as the entry point, this paper analyzes the current legislative situation of industrial injury insurance and compensation for tort damages in China, compares various applicable modes, and probes into the subject of tort liability for industrial accidents. The fault liability and the current special employment form, the special group's choice different suitable mode, provides the certain reference for the present judicial practice processing this kind of case.
【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923
，

本文编号：2094803