实体法与程序法交互作用下的共有物分割之诉

发布时间：2018-07-04 20:23

本文选题：共有物分割 + 射程范围　；参考：《现代法学》2016年02期

【摘要】：在共有物分割之诉中,实体法与程序法呈现出明显的交互关系。一是围绕共有物分割滋生的实体权利义务争议涉及诸多事项,基于实体权利义务的一体性,应对争议事项做一揽子解决。这就导致共有物分割之诉突破了程序法的诉讼类型区分,囊括了确认之诉、形成之诉与给付之诉等多重内容。二是实体法上关于裁判分割方法的确定,具有明显的非讼属性,而共有人份额的确定、是否符合分割条件的判断,则属于典型的诉讼事件。这就导致共有物分割之诉兼具非讼向度与诉讼向度,但为效率计,仍应在一个诉讼程序中一并解决。三是在具体确定起诉条件、分割方法、他项权利人的诉讼地位、诉讼费的分配时,亦涉及实体法与程序法的交错问题,应同时满足二者的要求。
[Abstract]:In the action of the division of common things, the substantive law and the procedural law show obvious interaction. The first is that the disputes about the rights and obligations of entities arising from the division of common things involve many matters. Based on the unity of substantive rights and obligations, the disputes should be resolved in a package. This leads to the division of common things breaking through the procedural law of the types of litigation, including the confirmation of the action, the form of litigation and payment of multiple content. The other is that the determination of the judgment segmentation method in the substantive law has obvious non-litigation attribute, and the determination of the share of the common person, whether or not it meets the judgment of the dividing condition, is a typical lawsuit event. This leads to the division of common property litigation both non-litigation and litigation, but for efficiency, it should be resolved in one proceeding. Third, in the specific determination of the conditions for prosecution, the method of division, the litigation status of the other obligee and the distribution of litigation costs, it also involves the interlacing of substantive law and procedural law, which should meet the requirements of both at the same time.
【作者单位】：重庆市沙坪坝区人民法院;
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】