以信赖利益保护为核心的债权表见让与制度
[Abstract]:The apparent assignment of a creditor's right means that, if the creditor has not actually made the assignment of the creditor's right, the transfer of the creditor's rights by his own act is sufficient to generate trust and be paid to the "transferee" which he considers "the transferee". And when it appears to legislators that recognition and protection are needed, the situation is treated as a concession. The system of express transfer of creditor's rights plays an active role in protecting the debtor's trust interests and safeguarding the transaction safety of creditor's rights, so it is of great significance to analyze and study this theory. The purpose of this paper is to explain the basic theory of the prima facie transfer of creditor's rights and combine it with the protection of trust interests. To solve the current judicial practice problems and improve future legislation to provide reference and help. The first part of this paper leads to the problems to be discussed through an actual case, the second part focuses on the basic connotation of the theory of apparent transfer, the third part is the core part of this paper. This part focuses on the basic concept of the protection of trust interests, the classification of categories and the internal relationship between it and the system of transfer of creditor's rights, and analyzes the theoretical problems such as the trust standard of the debtor, etc. The fourth part of this paper introduces the laws and regulations on the system of apparent transfer in Germany and Taiwan by means of comparative study. The last part summarizes the contents of the previous discussion. This paper puts forward the system value and legislative suggestion of establishing apparent transfer in the future Civil Code of our country. The most remarkable feature of this paper is that it enumerates the relevant cases. Through these cases, we can see more intuitively the practical function of setting up the system of assignment of creditor's rights, and at the same time, make the content of this article more full and fully discussed. Based on the analysis of the theory of transferability of creditor's rights, the following four research results are obtained. First, creditor's right is a powerful weapon for debtors to protect their legitimate rights and interests. Secondly, whether the debtor is bona fide or not in the constitutive elements of apparent assignment does not prevent the establishment of apparent assignment. Third, the notice of assignment as the appearance of rights is the root of the debtor's reliance interest, and the notice of assignment can be revoked under certain conditions. Fourth, the debtor's reliance on notice of assignment must meet certain standards, so the law should put forward specific requirements for the form of notice of assignment. Based on the above research results, the author thinks that it is in line with the legislative trend and the practical need to set up the system of transfer of creditor's rights in the general principles of debt compilation of the Civil Code in the future. In the future legislation, our country can draw lessons from the advanced legislative experience of Germany and Taiwan, and combine with the national conditions of our country to carry on the system innovation, and set up the system of transferring the creditor's rights on the basis of the security and convenience of the transaction of creditor's rights.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李盛;信赖利益概念之探析[J];当代法学;2002年01期
2 罗秀兰,李正平;信赖利益之概念新探[J];当代法学;2002年12期
3 鲁国利;论信赖利益及信赖利益赔偿[J];河南纺织高等专科学校学报;2002年04期
4 张安毅,郑志军;信赖利益及其保护价值分析[J];安阳大学学报;2003年01期
5 常淑静;信赖利益探析[J];山东审判;2003年04期
6 赵晓丽,董坡;信赖利益初探[J];渤海大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年04期
7 郭俊;;试论我国信赖利益保护制度的缺陷及完善[J];河南工程学院学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
8 方筱闽;;论不同法系视野下的合同信赖利益[J];商场现代化;2012年27期
9 李燕,朱文英;论信赖利益赔偿[J];政法论丛;2001年03期
10 贺为民;信赖利益辨析[J];政法论丛;2002年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前6条
1 陈林 耿梅玲;析缔约中的信赖利益及其赔偿[N];江苏经济报;2000年
2 北京市大兴区人民法院 刘雄智;因越权行为获得的利益不产生信赖利益[N];人民法院报;2011年
3 李汝银;信赖利益保护原则贵在塑造责任政府[N];人民法院报;2004年
4 ;房产局的决定应否撤销?[N];江苏法制报;2005年
5 谭炜杰;相对人的信赖利益受法律保护[N];人民法院报;2007年
6 海峡两岸关系法学研究会 张自合;监督条例之合法、可谈与可信[N];法制日报;2014年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 于德江;信赖利益保护研究[D];大连海事大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 谢尊武;合同信赖利益保护之比较研究[D];湖南师范大学;2004年
2 李子威;合同中的信赖利益概念探析[D];大连海事大学;2015年
3 李世杰;论纳税人信赖利益的保护[D];首都经济贸易大学;2015年
4 寇晶;纳税人信赖利益保护法律研究[D];兰州商学院;2014年
5 陈楠;论纳税人信赖利益保护[D];吉林财经大学;2016年
6 陆云婷;试析房屋买卖合同中信赖利益的相关问题[D];广东外语外贸大学;2016年
7 孙申慧;行政法上的信赖利益制度分析[D];吉林大学;2017年
8 张泽嵩;以信赖利益保护为核心的债权表见让与制度[D];山东大学;2017年
9 柴志虹;论信赖利益保护[D];内蒙古大学;2008年
10 夏慧君;信赖利益赔偿研究[D];华东政法大学;2008年
,本文编号:2161202
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2161202.html