论产品售后义务——兼评《侵权责任法》第46条
发布时间：2018-08-03 21:42
【摘要】：要求生产商对已经投入市场的产品负担售后义务是中国《侵权责任法》的一大突破。售后义务起源于严格责任下对发展风险抗辩的矫正,具有预防损害和保护消费者安全的重要功能。售后义务以生产商知道或者应当知道产品具有缺陷为产生的条件,至于缺陷存在的时点(售前抑或售后)则不影响售后义务的成立。违反售后义务所产生的侵权责任属于过错责任,生产商不得主张发展风险抗辩。关于受害者赔偿请求权除斥期间的规定不应在违反售后义务的侵权责任案件中适用。
[Abstract]:It is a breakthrough in China's tort law to require manufacturers to bear after-sale obligations on products that have already been put into the market. Post-sales obligation originated from the correction of development risk defense under strict liability and has the important function of preventing damage and protecting consumer safety. The condition of after-sale obligation is that the manufacturer knows or should know that the product has defects, but the time point of defect (pre-sale or after-sale) does not affect the establishment of after-sale obligation. The tort liability arising from the breach of the post-sale obligation belongs to the fault liability, and the manufacturer shall not claim the development risk defense. The provision on the right to claim compensation for victims shall not be applied in cases of tort liability for breach of post-sale obligations.
【作者单位】： 天津医科大学医学人文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“药品侵权问题研究”(14CFX032)
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2163078
[Abstract]:It is a breakthrough in China's tort law to require manufacturers to bear after-sale obligations on products that have already been put into the market. Post-sales obligation originated from the correction of development risk defense under strict liability and has the important function of preventing damage and protecting consumer safety. The condition of after-sale obligation is that the manufacturer knows or should know that the product has defects, but the time point of defect (pre-sale or after-sale) does not affect the establishment of after-sale obligation. The tort liability arising from the breach of the post-sale obligation belongs to the fault liability, and the manufacturer shall not claim the development risk defense. The provision on the right to claim compensation for victims shall not be applied in cases of tort liability for breach of post-sale obligations.
【作者单位】： 天津医科大学医学人文学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目“药品侵权问题研究”(14CFX032)
【分类号】：D923
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 涂永前;韩晓琪;;论产品责任之发展风险抗辩[J];西南民族大学学报(人文社科版);2010年10期
2 范小华;;发展风险抗辩制度及其启示[J];法律适用;2013年05期
3 焦鸿;;浅论产品责任发展风险抗辩之救济制度[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2014年05期
4 吴祥佑;杨长海;;发展风险抗辩的论争、实践与消费者救济[J];石家庄经济学院学报;2009年01期
5 徐喜荣;;药品缺陷责任研究[J];法制与社会;2012年30期
6 孟迪云;;论产品责任发展风险抗辩及其救济制度[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2006年06期
7 李蔚;论产品的发展风险责任及其抗辩[J];法学评论;1998年06期
8 程谷;论产品的发展风险[J];北方经贸;2005年07期
9 李运华;;售后警示义务:公平与效益的平衡[J];肇庆学院学报;2013年03期
10 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘志陟;基因工程的经济法问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2004年
，本文编号：2163078
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2163078.html
