全版权运营下作品多重改编问题研究
[Abstract]:With the progress of mobile Internet technology and the development of pan-entertainment industry, the whole copyright operation mode is gradually formed around the development of economic benefits of works. In the whole copyright operation mode, in order to excavate the copyright value as much as possible, a work is usually adapted into many forms, and with the success of the adapted work, the mining of the copyright value of the adapted work is also carried out. Then there appeared the re-adaptation of the adapted works, which resulted in multiple adaptations of the works. According to the current copyright Law, the copyright of the adapted work is enjoyed by the editor, but at the same time, the adaptation of the work is restricted by Article 12 of the copyright Law. Readaptation of the adapted works may cause conflicts of rights and interests between the original work parties, the original adaptation works parties, the original work licensees and the adaptation works licensees, resulting in various legal disputes. Under the whole copyright operation, the main body of the operation of the work is actively involved in the active promotion of the work, which makes the adaptation of the work present the characteristics of the diversification of the adaptation content and the diversification of the subject of the adaptation of the license. Through the analysis of typical cases of disputes caused by multiple adaptations of works under the whole copyright operation, it is found that the disputes arising from multiple adaptations of works are mostly caused by the unclear scope of authorizations of the adapted works and the conflict of the rights of the copyright subject of various parties. The root cause of the dispute is the vague definition of the exercise of the right to work adaptation in the current law. As the object of market transaction, the property rights attribute of the adaptation rights involves the balance of the market interests of the parties involved in the multiple adaptations of the works. From the angle of the relevant regulations of the law and the market value of the adapted works, this paper constructs the reasonable rules of interest distribution of the multiple adaptations of the works on the basis of the theory of balance of interests. The interests distribution of multiple adaptations of works should consider the balance of the interests of the creators and the interests of the creator and the users of the works, because the users of the works include the public, that is, the balance of the public interests should also be considered. In addition to the distribution of the interests of the parties stipulated in the contract, the authorization for multiple adaptations of works can also be analogous to the way of applying the statutory permission in copyright law, in order to achieve the balance of the interests of the parties to a certain extent. Based on the analysis of the present situation and the root causes of the disputes caused by the multiple adaptation of works, and the analysis of the balance of interests under the situation of multiple adaptation of the works, the author puts forward some suggestions for the improvement of the relevant system of the copyright Law, and clarifies the copyright exercise of the adapted works. "No infringement of the copyright of the original work" shall be reasonably interpreted in Article 12 of the copyright Law, "the copyright of the original work shall not be infringed" shall be interpreted as that the exercise of the right to adapt the work shall be restricted by the rights and interests of the copyright owner of the original work. By distinguishing the original expression part between the adapted work and the original work, the author reasonably regulates the authorization of the exercise of the property right of the copyright of the adapted work, without infringing upon the copyright of the original work, To achieve the original works and the adaptation of the market interests of the win-win.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D923.41
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨光夏;刘远山;赵文萍;;小说改编的影视作品著作权问题探究[J];哈尔滨学院学报;2016年08期
2 马晓明;;论影视作品中改编权与保护作品完整权的冲突和平衡[J];中国版权;2016年01期
3 张玲玲;张传磊;;改编权相关问题及其侵权判定方法[J];知识产权;2015年08期
4 张玲玲;;改编权侵权责任承担问题的一点思考[J];中国版权;2015年04期
5 张曼;;论著作权法定许可的正当性基础[J];知识产权;2013年01期
6 潘天怡;谭琪瑶;;著作权中的“人格权、财产权”二元分立论[J];知识产权;2012年08期
7 李峰;袁博;;演绎作品再演绎的授权规则——以《鬼吹灯》游戏改编案为视角[J];人民司法;2012年14期
8 李杨;;从“复制”到“传播”:著作财产权的权利基础审视[J];中国出版;2012年12期
9 张语南;;作品改编权问题研究[J];中国律师;2011年10期
10 陈锦川;;演绎作品著作权的司法保护[J];人民司法;2009年19期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 冯宏声;;保护作品完整权与改编权的博弈[N];中国知识产权报;2009年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 李杨;著作财产权体系中的个人使用问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 赵晓斌;动漫二次创作与在先作品的权利冲突研究[D];华南理工大学;2015年
2 王祥颖;网络媒体的全版权运营研究[D];复旦大学;2010年
,本文编号:2164133
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2164133.html