单方允诺制度研究
发布时间：2018-08-12 09:20
【摘要】：单方允诺是民法中债之发生的原因之一,英美法系对价理论和允诺禁反言原则下的允诺合同和无偿性允诺、大陆法系中德国民法典、意大利民法典、法国民法典中的规定均肯定了单方允诺之债。在我国,现行有关单方允诺的立法付之阙如,而学界观点纷纭繁杂,莫衷一是,且司法实践频现同案异判。因此,本文将单方允诺制度作为研究对象,旨在理清相关理论纷争,完善我国的债法体系,改善司法现状。文章总共分为四个部分。第一部分为单方允诺的基本理论,包括单方允诺的内涵和外延;第二部分是对单方允诺进行规范上的分析,包括英美法中单诺合同和无偿性允诺的具体规定、大陆法系比较完备的《德国民法典》和《意大利民法典》具体条款的分析以及对现行我国现行法中单方允诺规定欠缺的列举;第三部分是对单方允诺进行实证分析,阐述目前司法现状中主要存在单方允诺法律性质界定不清和损害赔偿范围不够完善的问题;第四部分欲构筑比较完善的单方允诺制度,在债法分则的“债之发生原因”一章应增设具体条款,应包括明确其法律地位、定义、单方允诺的具体类型、成立规则、赔偿范围和竞合问题。
[Abstract]:Unilateral promise is one of the causes of debt in civil law. The promissory contract and gratuitous promise under the consideration theory of Anglo-American law system and the principle of estoppel of promise, the German civil code, the Italian civil code and the French civil code all affirm the debt of unilateral promise. For example, there are many different opinions in the academic circles, and the judicial practice often leads to different judgments in the same case. Therefore, this paper takes the unilateral promise system as the research object, aiming at clarifying the relevant theoretical disputes, perfecting the debt law system and improving the judicial situation in China. The first part is the basic theory of unilateral promise, including unilateral promise. The second part is the normative analysis of the unilateral promise, including the specific provisions of the contract of promise and the promise of gratuity in Anglo-American law, the comparatively complete provisions of the civil code of Germany and the civil code of Italy in the civil law system, and the listing of the deficiencies of the provisions of the unilateral promise in the current law of our country. The third part is the empirical analysis of the unilateral promise, explaining that the legal nature of the unilateral promise is not clearly defined and the scope of compensation for damages is not perfect in the current judicial situation; the fourth part is to build a more perfect unilateral promise system, in the chapter of "the causes of debt" of the debt law, specific provisions should be added, including Define its legal status, definition, specific types of unilateral promises, rules of establishment, scope of compensation and the issue of concurrence.
【学位授予单位】：广州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2178623
[Abstract]:Unilateral promise is one of the causes of debt in civil law. The promissory contract and gratuitous promise under the consideration theory of Anglo-American law system and the principle of estoppel of promise, the German civil code, the Italian civil code and the French civil code all affirm the debt of unilateral promise. For example, there are many different opinions in the academic circles, and the judicial practice often leads to different judgments in the same case. Therefore, this paper takes the unilateral promise system as the research object, aiming at clarifying the relevant theoretical disputes, perfecting the debt law system and improving the judicial situation in China. The first part is the basic theory of unilateral promise, including unilateral promise. The second part is the normative analysis of the unilateral promise, including the specific provisions of the contract of promise and the promise of gratuity in Anglo-American law, the comparatively complete provisions of the civil code of Germany and the civil code of Italy in the civil law system, and the listing of the deficiencies of the provisions of the unilateral promise in the current law of our country. The third part is the empirical analysis of the unilateral promise, explaining that the legal nature of the unilateral promise is not clearly defined and the scope of compensation for damages is not perfect in the current judicial situation; the fourth part is to build a more perfect unilateral promise system, in the chapter of "the causes of debt" of the debt law, specific provisions should be added, including Define its legal status, definition, specific types of unilateral promises, rules of establishment, scope of compensation and the issue of concurrence.
【学位授予单位】：广州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李世刚;;中国债编体系构建中若干基础关系的协调——从法国重构债法体系的经验观察[J];法学研究;2016年05期
2 王利明;;论债法总则与合同法总则的关系[J];广东社会科学;2014年05期
3 许中缘;;论民法中单方法律行为的体系化调整[J];法学;2014年07期
4 陆青;;债法总则的功能演变——从共同规范到体系整合[J];当代法学;2014年04期
5 赵秀梅;夏辰旭;;悬赏广告法律性质问题研究[J];山东社会科学;2013年11期
6 徐涤宇;黄美玲;;单方允诺的效力根据[J];中国社会科学;2013年04期
7 崔建远;;中国债法的现状与未来[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2013年01期
8 戴建庭;白明刚;;单方法律行为、合同、决议的瑕疵分析和责任比较[J];东方法学;2012年04期
9 白明刚;;单方法律行为、合同、决议之比较分析[J];福建法学;2012年02期
10 赵志娟;;浅析单方允诺的法律性质[J];华北水利水电学院学报(社科版);2011年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 许嘉悦;我国慈善行为实施研究[D];华东交通大学;2012年
2 徐小铂;悬赏广告法律问题研究[D];中南民族大学;2012年
3 车韵婷;悬赏广告法律问题研究[D];黑龙江大学;2011年
4 赵振士;单方允诺法律制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2010年
5 赵唐民;悬赏广告制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2003年
，本文编号：2178623
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2178623.html
