立体商标合理使用的边界

发布时间：2018-08-31 12:20

【摘要】：我国2001年对商标法进行修改,将立体商标(三维标志)纳入了《商标法》的保护范围。立体商标不同于普通的二维商标,其在注册上除需要具有显著性外,还需要具有非实用功能性以及非美学功能性的限制性要件。但是我国《商标法》却没有规定非实用功能性以及非美学功能性的概念以及认定标准,使得在司法实践中据以判断立体商标合理使用的边界也很模糊,难以做出准确的认定。而且由于立体商标所具有的特殊性使得其容易与外观设计专利权以及产品包装权产生冲突,而这些冲突的界限就是立体商标合理使用的边界。因此,笔者认为我们要想准确的界定立体商标合理使用的边界,就必须得研究立体商标显著性、非实用功能性以及非美学功能性的边缘界限以及冲突的界限并针对这些边缘界限找到立体商标合理使用的一般标准和特殊标准,以确定立体商标合理使用的界限。
[Abstract]:In 2001, the Trademark Law was amended in our country, and the three-dimensional trademark (three dimensional mark) was brought into the protection scope of Trademark Law. The three-dimensional trademark is different from the ordinary two-dimensional trademark. In addition to its significance, it also needs the restrictive elements of non-practical and non-aesthetic functions. However, the Trademark Law of our country has not stipulated the concepts and standards of non-utility function and non-aesthetic function, which makes the boundary of judging the rational use of three-dimensional trademark in judicial practice very vague, and it is difficult to make an accurate determination. Because of the particularity of stereoscopic trademark, it is easy to conflict with design patent right and product packaging right, and the boundary of these conflicts is the boundary of rational use of stereoscopic trademark. Therefore, the author thinks that if we want to define the boundary of rational use of stereoscopic trademark, we must study the significance of stereoscopic trademark. In order to determine the boundary of reasonable use of stereoscopic trademarks, general and special standards for the rational use of stereoscopic trademarks are found according to the boundary of nonutility and non-aesthetic functions as well as the boundaries of conflict.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923.43

【相似文献】