地方政府招商引资合同问题的研究

发布时间：2018-10-30 17:16

【摘要】：招商引资是近些年来各地方政府及经济技术开发区发展地区经济的一种重要方式,并且有些地方取得了良好的成果,促进了地方经济的发展与繁荣。招商引资按照不同的分类标准可分为不同的类型,其中按照招商主体来分,招商引资可分为政府招商引资、开发区招商引资、企业招商引资和中介招商引资。本文所研究的招商引资仅指以地方政府(含开发区在内)为招商主体的招商引资。招商引资合同是地方政府实现招商引资的一种最主要的方式,因此招商引资合同在实践中被广泛的应用。与之相伴随的是,因招商引资合同引发的纠纷也越来越多。结合司法实践及地方政府招商引资工作的实践来看,目前,因政府招商引资合同引发的纠纷主要体现在三个方面,一个是关于政府招商引资合同的性质问题的争论,目前就该争论存在着行政合同说、民事合同说、合同性质类型化处理说;一个是关于政府招商引资合同效力的问题,实践中有部分政府招商引资合同是存在效力瑕疵的,其中的原因主要有主体不适格、内容违法、程序违法几个方面;另一个是关于招商引资合同违约责任的问题。对于政府招商引资合同的性质,本文从形式标准和实质标准相结合的角度进行分析,得出政府招商引资合同在性质上为行政合同的结论。而之所以广泛存在着影响招商引资合同效力的情形,其原因主要在于:其一,目前我国缺乏关于政府招商引资的专门法律、法规;其二,当前地方政府招商引资竞争激烈,致使一些地方政府在招商引资过程中趋于盲目;其三,现行的法律、法规、政策的软约束。为此,可以从以下几个方面着手,以减少实践中影响政府招商引资合同效力情形的发生,一方面,完善招商引资的法律、法规;一方面,改变当前的政绩评价体系及政府的观念;另一方面,加强法律、法规的执行。在政府招商引资合同的履行中,无论是地方政府还是投资人,都存在着一些违约的情形,地方政府承担违约责任的方式主要包括继续履行、承担损害赔偿责任、支付违约金等,投资人承担违约责任的方式主要包括实际履行、承担行政制裁后果、损害赔偿、支付违约金等。
[Abstract]:Attracting investment is an important way for local governments and economic and technological development zones to develop regional economy in recent years, and some places have achieved good results, which has promoted the development and prosperity of local economy. According to different classification standards, investment can be divided into different types, among them, according to the subject of investment, investment can be divided into government investment, development zone investment, enterprise investment and intermediary investment. The investment attraction studied in this paper only refers to the local government (including the development zone) as the main investment attraction. The contract of attracting investment is one of the most important ways for local government to realize it, so it is widely used in practice. With it, as a result of investment contracts caused by more and more disputes. According to the judicial practice and the practice of the local government's investment promotion, at present, the disputes caused by the government's investment contract are mainly reflected in three aspects: one is the dispute about the nature of the government's investment contract. At present, there are administrative contract theory, civil contract theory and contract nature classification theory. One is about the effectiveness of government contracts for attracting investment. In practice, there are some defects in the effectiveness of government contracts for attracting investment, the main causes of which are main body discomfort, illegal content and illegal procedure. The other is about the issue of the liability for breach of contract of attracting investment. This paper analyzes the nature of the government investment contract from the angle of combining the formal standard and the substantive standard, and draws the conclusion that the nature of the government investment contract is administrative contract. The reasons for the widespread influence on the effectiveness of investment contracts are as follows: first, there is a lack of special laws and regulations on government investment promotion in our country at present; Second, the current fierce competition of local governments to attract investment, resulting in some local governments tend to blind in the process of attracting investment; third, the current laws, regulations, policies of soft constraints. To this end, we can start from the following aspects, in order to reduce the effect of government investment contracts in practice, on the one hand, improve the laws and regulations; On the one hand, to change the current performance evaluation system and the concept of government; on the other hand, to strengthen the implementation of laws and regulations. In the performance of government contracts to attract investment, whether local governments or investors, there are some cases of breach of contract. The main ways for local governments to bear the liability for breach of contract include continued performance, liability for damages, payment of liquidated damages, and so on. The main ways for investors to bear liability for breach of contract include actual performance, bearing the consequences of administrative sanctions, compensation for damages, payment of liquidated damages and so on.
【学位授予单位】：湘潭大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D923.6

【相似文献】