当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 民法论文 >

论我国动产抵押物转让制度之完善

发布时间:2018-10-31 07:43
【摘要】:动产抵押制度是现代社会解决融资担保问题的有效方式,该制度的发展对现代社会企业融资意义重大。但由于动产抵押制度存在固有的内在诟病,致使动产抵押物转让过程中抵押权人、抵押人及受让人的利益纠纷难以通过有效的方式化解,矛盾冲突总是伴随着动产抵押物的转让而发生。所以,如何通过更好的制度设计克服动产抵押制度的内在缺陷,发挥动产抵押制度对当今社会的重要作用,是立法中面临的一个难题。我国《担保法》与《物权法》中都确立了动产抵押制度,但是立法规定没能很好的协调解决动产抵押物转让时面临的利益冲突。本文通过分析动产抵押制度的内在缺陷及动产抵押物转让几种规范模式的不足,以期探寻到更好的方法弥补动产抵押制度的缺陷,为我国动产抵押物转让中的利益冲突寻找到更加妥当的解决模式。本文除了引言与结论部分外,主要通过以下几个方面进行阐述。 第一部分对动产抵押问题进行论述。本部分首先就动产抵押概念进行研究,进而阐释动产抵押制度的必要性,最后比较阐释两大法系关于动产抵押制度的发展状况,以期通过分析不同法系地区对该制度的不同规定,明确动产抵押制度在世界范围内的发展概况。 第二部分通过介绍动产抵押制度发展面临的困境与必要性分析,明确动产抵押制度对社会融资担保的重要意义。同时通过介绍动产抵押物转让过程中抵押人、抵押权人及受让人的利益体现,探究出动产抵押物转让冲突的根源所在,即动产抵押物之上占有与登记造成的二元公示矛盾。 第三部分首先对我国动产抵押制度的立法演进进行分析,然后通过比较我国当前立法中几种解决动产抵押物转让的冲突模式,就限制处分模式、追及主义模式及替代清偿模式缺陷进行评析,力求分析立法中的不足,以期为下一步有针对性的提出解决对策做好铺垫。 第四部分就我国目前动产抵押物转让过程中存在的问题提出具体的制度设计,包括采用登记与辅助登记公示并用的二重模式、先代位后追及的双重模式及相应的司法解释补救措施。
[Abstract]:The system of chattel mortgage is an effective way to solve the problem of financing guarantee in modern society, and the development of this system is of great significance to the financing of enterprises in modern society. However, due to the inherent criticism of chattel mortgage system, it is difficult to resolve the interests disputes between mortgagee, mortgagor and transferee in the process of chattel mortgage transfer. Contradictions and conflicts are always accompanied by the transfer of chattel collateral. Therefore, how to overcome the inherent defects of chattel mortgage system through better system design and play an important role of chattel mortgage system in today's society is a difficult problem in legislation. The system of chattel mortgage has been established in the guarantee Law of our country and the Real right Law, but the legislation has not been able to solve the conflict of interest when the chattel mortgage is transferred in a very good way. By analyzing the immanent defects of the chattel mortgage system and the deficiency of several normative modes of the chattel mortgage transfer, this paper hopes to find a better way to make up the defects of the chattel mortgage system. To find a more appropriate solution for the conflicts of interest in the transfer of chattel collateral in China. In addition to the introduction and conclusion of this article, mainly through the following aspects to elaborate. The first part discusses the issue of chattel mortgage. This part firstly studies the concept of chattel mortgage, and then explains the necessity of chattel mortgage system. Finally, it compares and explains the development of chattel mortgage system in two legal systems. By analyzing the different regulations of this system in different legal systems, the development of chattel mortgage system in the world is clarified. The second part analyzes the difficulties and necessity of the development of chattel mortgage system, and clarifies the significance of chattel mortgage system to social financing guarantee. At the same time, by introducing the interests of mortgagors, mortgagees and transferees in the process of chattel mortgage transfer, this paper probes into the root of the conflict of chattel mortgage transfer, that is, the contradiction between possession and registration of movable property mortgage. The third part first analyzes the legislative evolution of the chattel mortgage system in our country, and then, by comparing several conflict modes in the current legislation of our country to resolve the transfer of movable property mortgage, it limits the disposition mode. In order to lay a good foundation for the next step, the author analyzes the shortcomings of the legislation by analyzing the defects of the pattern of pursuing the doctrine and the mode of replacing the settlement. The fourth part puts forward the concrete system design for the problems existing in the process of the transfer of chattel mortgage in our country at present, including adopting the dual mode of combining registration and auxiliary registration publicity. The dual mode of the first generation and the corresponding judicial explanation.
【学位授予单位】:北京交通大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前8条

1 姜战军;动产抵押制度质疑——以质疑动产抵押的公示及效力为中心[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2005年06期

2 许明月;;抵押物转让制度之立法缺失及其司法解释补救——评《中华人民共和国物权法》第191条[J];法商研究;2008年02期

3 温世扬,廖焕国;论抵押权物上代位性与物上追及力之共容[J];法学;2001年06期

4 梁上上,贝金欣;抵押物转让中的利益衡量与制度设计[J];法学研究;2005年04期

5 邹海林;抵押物的转让与抵押权的效力[J];法学研究;1999年04期

6 张晓娟;;动产抵押制度之完善初探[J];现代财经(天津财经大学学报);2008年02期

7 纪海龙;;解构动产公示、公信原则[J];中外法学;2014年03期

8 程啸;;论抵押财产的转让 “重庆索特盐化股份有限公司与重庆新万基房地产开发有限公司土地使用权转让合同纠纷案”评释[J];中外法学;2014年05期

相关博士学位论文 前1条

1 李珏;动产抵押研究[D];吉林大学;2013年



本文编号:2301419

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2301419.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户9832f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com