简析被遗忘权在我国的确立
发布时间：2018-10-31 09:31
【摘要】：被遗忘权的确立肇始他国,目的在于赋予自然人在网络领域对个人信息的自决权利。欧盟的“被遗忘权第一案”与我国的“被遗忘权第一案”存在差异性,我国案件中原告当事人的败诉不能否定我国确立被遗忘权的必要性。该项权利具有人格权属性,应属于个人信息权中的一项权利内容,它不同于人格权中的隐私权和名誉权。在网络重要性日趋提高的大数据时代背景下,网络用户与网络公司的实力相差悬殊,自然人对于其个人信息在网络领域“被遗忘”的安全保护需求渐渐涌现。但我国近些年的规范性文件对自然人个人信息“被遗忘”的保护规定不够全面,已有网络服务提供者采取的相关实践做法有待完善。因此,我国有必要确立被遗忘权,通过删除的方式保护自然人的个人信息。对于被遗忘权保护制度的建构应明确该权利构造,包括权利主体、义务主体和权利的行使,注意权利的适用范围,并与《侵权责任法》相衔接,保护自然人的被遗忘权。
[Abstract]:The establishment of the right to be forgotten begins in other countries, in order to give natural persons the right to self-determination of personal information in the field of network. There are differences between the first case of the right to be forgotten in the EU and the first case of the right to be forgotten in China. The failure of the plaintiff in the case of our country cannot negate the necessity of establishing the right to be forgotten in our country. This right has the attribute of personality right and should belong to the content of the right of personal information, which is different from the right of privacy and reputation in personality right. Under the background of big data, where the importance of network is increasing day by day, the strength of network users and network companies is far from equal, and the security protection needs of natural persons for their personal information are gradually emerging in the field of network. However, in recent years, the regulations on the protection of personal information of natural persons "forgotten" in the normative documents of our country are not comprehensive enough, and the relevant practices adopted by network service providers need to be improved. Therefore, it is necessary to establish the right to be forgotten and protect the personal information of natural persons by deleting it. The construction of the protection system of the right to be forgotten should be made clear, including the subject of right, the subject of obligation and the exercise of right, pay attention to the scope of application of right, and link up with the Law of Tort liability to protect the right of oblivion of natural person.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2301677
[Abstract]:The establishment of the right to be forgotten begins in other countries, in order to give natural persons the right to self-determination of personal information in the field of network. There are differences between the first case of the right to be forgotten in the EU and the first case of the right to be forgotten in China. The failure of the plaintiff in the case of our country cannot negate the necessity of establishing the right to be forgotten in our country. This right has the attribute of personality right and should belong to the content of the right of personal information, which is different from the right of privacy and reputation in personality right. Under the background of big data, where the importance of network is increasing day by day, the strength of network users and network companies is far from equal, and the security protection needs of natural persons for their personal information are gradually emerging in the field of network. However, in recent years, the regulations on the protection of personal information of natural persons "forgotten" in the normative documents of our country are not comprehensive enough, and the relevant practices adopted by network service providers need to be improved. Therefore, it is necessary to establish the right to be forgotten and protect the personal information of natural persons by deleting it. The construction of the protection system of the right to be forgotten should be made clear, including the subject of right, the subject of obligation and the exercise of right, pay attention to the scope of application of right, and link up with the Law of Tort liability to protect the right of oblivion of natural person.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王春晖;;《网络安全法》六大法律制度解析[J];南京邮电大学学报(自然科学版);2017年01期
2 张里安;韩旭至;;“被遗忘权”:大数据时代下的新问题[J];河北法学;2017年03期
3 廖磊;;搜索引擎服务商的个人信息保护义务研究——以被遗忘权为中心[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2017年01期
4 田新月;;欧盟《一般数据保护条例》新规则评析[J];武大国际法评论;2016年02期
5 张建文;李倩;;被遗忘权的保护标准研究——以我国“被遗忘权第一案”为中心[J];晋阳学刊;2016年06期
6 万方;;终将被遗忘的权利——我国引入被遗忘权的思考[J];法学评论;2016年06期
7 赵锐;;被遗忘权:理性评判与法律构造[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2016年05期
8 王融;;《欧盟数据保护通用条例》详解[J];大数据;2016年04期
9 张建文;高完成;;被遗忘权的本体论及本土化研究[J];吉首大学学报(社会科学版);2016年03期
10 张恩典;;大数据时代的被遗忘权之争[J];学习与探索;2016年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 高健;文海宣;;法院审结全国首例“被遗忘权”案[N];北京日报;2016年
，本文编号：2301677
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2301677.html
