论不作为侵权之补充责任
发布时间：2018-11-04 16:35
【摘要】：本文论述不作为侵权责任的补充责任,以劳务派遣、经营者安保义务等为例进行比较,从而发现补充责任不一致之处,及责任追偿方面的不同。对一般安全注意义务的成立要素及安全义务人的标准、履行、违反进行阐述,从而分成三个章节进行论述。第一部分论述不作为侵权补充责任的基本含义、特征、及各国对不作为侵权责任的立法情况。第二部分论述不作为侵权责任的义务内容与来源,以一般注意义义务为内涵,在成立要素及成立标准,注意义务的履行、注意义务的违反并结合补充责任人义务违反判断。第三部分论述不作为侵权的补充责任,分析了我国现在对补充责任的立法现状,在此基础上对第三人介入情形下对不作为侵权人责任的因果关系的判断的认定,从而涉及到在责任范围对直接侵权人的追偿问题是否可以实现。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the supplementary liability of tort liability for omission, taking labor dispatch, operator security obligation and so on as examples to compare, thus finding out the inconsistency of supplementary liability and the difference in liability recovery. This paper expounds the establishment elements of the general duty of care and the standards of the safety obligor, the performance and the violation thereof, and divides them into three chapters. The first part discusses the basic meaning, characteristics and legislation of tort liability of omission. The second part discusses the content and source of the obligation of omission tort liability, taking the general duty of care as the connotation, the essential elements and the standard of establishment, the fulfillment of the duty of care, the breach of the duty of care and the judgment of breach of the obligation of supplementary responsibility. The third part discusses the supplementary liability of omission tort, analyzes the current legislative situation of supplementary liability in our country, and on this basis, determines the causality of the liability of the omission infringer under the situation of the intervention of the third party. Therefore, the question of whether the direct infringer can be recovered in the scope of liability can be realized.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923
本文编号：2310466
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the supplementary liability of tort liability for omission, taking labor dispatch, operator security obligation and so on as examples to compare, thus finding out the inconsistency of supplementary liability and the difference in liability recovery. This paper expounds the establishment elements of the general duty of care and the standards of the safety obligor, the performance and the violation thereof, and divides them into three chapters. The first part discusses the basic meaning, characteristics and legislation of tort liability of omission. The second part discusses the content and source of the obligation of omission tort liability, taking the general duty of care as the connotation, the essential elements and the standard of establishment, the fulfillment of the duty of care, the breach of the duty of care and the judgment of breach of the obligation of supplementary responsibility. The third part discusses the supplementary liability of omission tort, analyzes the current legislative situation of supplementary liability in our country, and on this basis, determines the causality of the liability of the omission infringer under the situation of the intervention of the third party. Therefore, the question of whether the direct infringer can be recovered in the scope of liability can be realized.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D923
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王竹;;论风险责任概念的确立[J];北方法学;2011年02期
2 代正伟;胡庆;;从现行法规的视角比较不真正连带责任和补充责任[J];中共成都市委党校学报(哲学社会科学);2006年02期
3 王竹;;论连带责任分摊请求权——兼论不具有分摊能力连带责任人份额的再分配方案[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2010年03期
4 蔡军龙;;侵权行为补充责任的法律性质分析[J];福建法学;2009年03期
5 陈现杰;《最高人民法院关于审理人身损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的若干理论与实务问题解析[J];法律适用;2004年02期
6 姜强;;《侵权责任法》中的连带责任、不真正连带责任及其诉讼程序[J];法律适用;2010年07期
7 叶金强;;论过错程度对侵权构成及效果之影响[J];法商研究;2009年03期
8 杨连专;;论侵权补充责任中的几个问题[J];法学杂志;2009年06期
9 朱岩;;当代德国侵权法上因果关系理论和实务中的主要问题[J];法学家;2004年06期
10 杨立新;梁清;;原因力的因果关系理论基础及其具体应用[J];法学家;2006年06期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 俞巍;论多数人承担民事责任的类型[D];华东政法学院;2005年
，本文编号：2310466
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/minfalunwen/2310466.html
